We are funding science backwards.

We make people pay to have access to databases to read research papers and then allow them to cite applicable papers for free.

It should be the opposite. Reading the papers should be free, and researchers should have to pay a license to cite the papers of others.

Consider an alternative research economy where researchers have to pay to cite prior work. That would better incentivise reseachers to focus their studies on works that are most likely to be cited by others (ie. they would be incentivised to produce more impactful research). The researchers that produce highly cited papers would become their own revenue stream to self-fund more of their own work.

Einstein would have died a very very rich man.

That would allow highly successful reseachers to be much less reliant on outside grant sources, and show those grant sources to spread their resources to more new researchers.

  • Solumbran@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 days ago

    Or just stop this stupid research capitalism and just fund research enough so that it can be fully free.

    Your system isn’t useful, it will just change what bullshit research aims for, and will prevent underfunded researchers from publishing papers that rely on others.

    Now that I think about it, your system feels worse than what is currently in place.