Well thats a crackpot theory if I ever heard one. Jesus isn’t real, and never was. Any apocalyptic preacher who thought they were the son of God just had schizophrenia
Nahh, you’re right, I should have dropped a ‘/s’ tone indicator on there, that’s on me for assuming the reader can see that I was being intentionally ridiculous
There is no literature. Information is a terrain of struggle, fit only for attacks and tribal virtue signalling. By not already knowing this you have proven you’re a fascist or other thing i dislike.
The reason for me being I cant read (decipher) your post?
I genuinely can’t tell what you’re trying to say, by “There is no literature” do you mean nobody’s written the rulebook for communication through text, or are you saying that nobody’s literate any more?
Talking about “Information is a terrain of struggle” doesn’t actually SAY anything but it sounds like vague intellectualism
Then the usual thing of suggesting people automatically go “you’re a fascist or thing I don’t like” in response to a lack of knowledge is not only a bad faith argument but it shows you don’t know shit about people.
(None of this is an attack on you personally, I’m just posing what little I can infer from what your comment says, to explain my confusion)
No. I literally think Jesus is being reborn in occupied Palestine and his mother is literally repeatedly dying as a result of the ongoing genocide.
Well thats a crackpot theory if I ever heard one. Jesus isn’t real, and never was. Any apocalyptic preacher who thought they were the son of God just had schizophrenia
My brother in christ please learn to read sarcasm.
(If you’re on the spectrum as well, then sorry for not being literal with what I was saying, but STILL)
Also not trying to virtue signal here, but that’s kinda offensive to schizophrenics, comparing them to religious zealots
I asked if you were being serious and you said yes. In what world is that considered sarcasm?
Nahh, you’re right, I should have dropped a ‘/s’ tone indicator on there, that’s on me for assuming the reader can see that I was being intentionally ridiculous
It’s how someone would likely reply (sarcastically) when speaking in offline conversation.
Key part there is in person. That stuff doesn’t translate over text. Now I know.
There is no literature. Information is a terrain of struggle, fit only for attacks and tribal virtue signalling. By not already knowing this you have proven you’re a fascist or other thing i dislike.
Some serious nominative determinism in your post because “Jesse what the fuck are you talking about?” Lmao
I think we agree on the nominative determinism, but not the reason :(
The reason for me being I cant read (decipher) your post?
I genuinely can’t tell what you’re trying to say, by “There is no literature” do you mean nobody’s written the rulebook for communication through text, or are you saying that nobody’s literate any more?
Talking about “Information is a terrain of struggle” doesn’t actually SAY anything but it sounds like vague intellectualism
Then the usual thing of suggesting people automatically go “you’re a fascist or thing I don’t like” in response to a lack of knowledge is not only a bad faith argument but it shows you don’t know shit about people.
(None of this is an attack on you personally, I’m just posing what little I can infer from what your comment says, to explain my confusion)