youcantreadthis

Okay so a real reply if weve still got an audience:

Notice how you attack me for being both ‘over simplified’ and ‘florid’ in this thread? You need two things. The first is to defend the status quo. The second is to feel edgy transgressive and clever.

And youre just doing that with ideas you misunderstand so badly i cant even bring myself to correct you on. Youre not applying logic; youre just rationalizing.

Things are sometimes simple though. Violence indeed bad. Best avoided. Not a good thing. Youve clearly lived a very sheltered life and violence to you is just an abstraction. Youve never experienced the world so its really easy to imagine its all as flat and consequence free as your abstractions.

Sorry, forgot about nominative determinism.

I think we agree on the nominative determinism, but not the reason :(

What, pray tell, would not be obnoxious?

So to start off with, youre using one example of game theory, the prisoners dilemma, as a stand in for right/wrong.

Which is so fucking many levels of insane i cant even address here.

Are you in the bay area? That seems like san francisco brand stupid.

Then you project your oversimplification onto me. Thats cool. Inspecting your intellectual lacunae is hella cool. You should try it.

Its not that i dont believe you

Might be kids (under-40s) these days dont remember functional search. Or theres no easy packages available.

Its implied, like the rape cults snd persecution of queer people.

There is no literature. Information is a terrain of struggle, fit only for attacks and tribal virtue signalling. By not already knowing this you have proven you’re a fascist or other thing i dislike.

boom, headshot!

oh hey the body’s still squirming, got any lu… Wait nevermind this ones hydrated enough i can just use the blood. Little water thief deserved this.

Posadism, but dumber and worse!

Do there exist christians who arent?

I think systems based on violence are bad, because i think violence is bad. Because theyre systems of violence, i do not think theres a way to be rid of them short of violence, but i think avoiding systematizing that violence minimizes the collateral harms.

I dont think murder being illegal has saved more lives than it has cost. I will not elaborate upon my ecidence, but it is from places squalid and opulent, decadent and visceral. The light it casts you in makes you look like a violent selfish child willing to kill–by proxy only, of course– to not have to consider the violence that is every calorie of sustenance to them.

No im sorry, nuance is impossible and considering children as people rather than property is human extinctionist and straightphobic. Why are you so mean?why do you hate me?

If consent is required for something you need, its not really consent.

Reject the tyranny of pants!

Fucking nvidia ruining everything.

No i actually understand an amount of psychology and moral philosophy beyond some shit i read in a pop-sci or cold war history book so ive got a little more depth than a superficial understanding of ‘game theory’, but i do assess the people around me! The reliably bad ones are called cops and they will always do the worst thing.

More laws helps nothing. Laws are just excuses to not fix problems.

Oh no. Higher pc component prices! Somebody hasnt shopped computer recently.

Okay but what if i really want to? Youre just being human ectinctionist and actially straightphobic.

You think people will instinctively collaborate and not be shitty, therefore we should give proven-bad actors more cover to act badly?