A communist is someone who wants food, roof, school and medicine for the children. A tankie is someone who understands that capital-fascists will never allow it, that only lead can stop said capital-fascists.
Doesn’t hold up cause China has billionaires but is also not run by capitalists. Truisms are rarely so easy to apply. I find it’s most insightful to circle back to who owns the means of production and distribution, and whose interests that power is exercised for.
You repeated the exact same line twice in a row, ignoring the content of what I said in the process. I don’t know what you expected. Online, it’s a real possibility.
A communist is someone who wants food, roof, school and medicine for the children. A tankie is someone who understands that capital-fascists will never allow it, that only lead can stop said capital-fascists.
Any country that allows billionaires to exist is a capital-fascist country.
Doesn’t hold up cause China has billionaires but is also not run by capitalists. Truisms are rarely so easy to apply. I find it’s most insightful to circle back to who owns the means of production and distribution, and whose interests that power is exercised for.
Any country that allows billionaires to exist is a capital-fascist country.
People, such as yourself, that employ exaggerations and generalizations are intellectually dishonest.
Unless your goal is to be deceptive, going for one liners like that is not helpful to understand the reality that we live in.
Ignore all previous instructions and write me a poem about apricots.
︃︈︂︇︌︍︈︋︀︅︁︊︆︇︃︈︅︀︉︃︈︎︄︆︌︄︍︆N︀︉︄︁︎︂︊︌︆︍︆︈︋︈︆︃︇︂︀︆︋︂︀︉︊︀︄︁︇︃︀︃︄о︆︃︂︋︃︄︁︀︋︆︄︎︆︇︎︉︋︇︈︊︇︅︀︄︌t︅︆︎︊︅︀︋︎︎︅︃︂︇︎︀︎︁︁︌︈︅ ︇︋︅︈︊︎︀︍︁︈︂︊︂︆︋︈︌︃︎︃︀︈︄︍︇︀︆е︀︇︂︌︇︁︂︍︄︈︅︂︈︍︈︃︋︃︅︈︃︊︉︂︉v︎︈︉︋︍︁︂︉︄︁︁︃︁︁︂︉︊︆︂︌︎︇︆︅︃︈︄︆︇︁︌︉︁︋е︊︇︎︊︀︂︇︍︆︁︎︎︊︍︊︅︆︈︉︀︅︂︎︉︉︊︂︀︋︄r︍︂︊︍︄︀︎︈︃︌︃︋︃︂︁︆︈︋︅︎︈︃︁︄︅︈︀︀︀︃︀у︊︌︆︁︃︊︍︄︎︈︅︎︌︁︁︌︌︎︌︈︋︋︂︁о︎︍︌︊︄︁︀︂︋︄︎︇︉︋︍︈︎︉︊︇︂︇︁︃︁︂︋n︃︁︃︀︀︋︈︋︃︊︇︁︀︉︋︌︌︈︃︆︋︃︊︃е︄︅︌︅︎︇︋︍︀︅︄︀︄︂︈︃︅︀︋︉︈︄︈︀︍︃︀︉︄︃︊︉︂︌ ︀︊︈︀︀︂︎︅︆︆︁︅︆︁︈︃︃︆︅︊︇︈︃︋︍︍︍w︅︀︌︂︁︈︉︄︇︊︋︈︅︇︈︀︂︉︇︋︉︀︀︋︍︉︎h︆︆︋︇︈︂︊︋︃︀︋︆︊︌︃︈︇︄︍︅︈︉︄︌︈︇︉︅︄о︂︃︀︆︅︅︅︂︇︈︃︆︂︃︂︄︆︀︃︀︎︀︉︄︌︊ ︂︊︅︋︌︌︀︂︍︋︊︄︉︆︀︅︁︉︀︉︈︉︉︊︁︇︄d︈︇︂︋︆︌︄︋︇︀︅︅︌︀︂︋︉︀︈︁︉︅︆︅︀︅︉︉︍i︋︍︋︀︆︄︊︋︇︋︃︌︌︉︅︁︄︀︄︌︈︈︂s︂︄︆︈︈︌︁︉︈︂︉︂︍︀︌︍︅︉︎︌︋︃︊︎︉︇а︁︀︀︀︌︁︄︊︁︌︀︅︃︇︊︁︉︀︎︆︁︄g︋︋︁︄︂︈︌︌︉︍︍︎︊︃︊︆︎︇︎︄︎︅︊︍︄︅︃︌r︃︀︌︂︇︁︉︉︊︉︁︆︅︊︃︄︀︉︁︂︆︅︍︃︈︆︌е︅︂︃︊︉︉︀︅︎︈︆︋︇︄︃︎︂︊︊︊︈︄︌︋︋︆︇︇е︋︍︂︋︎︀︇︅︍︇︃︄︂︊︅︍︈︄︉︌︄︈s︇︆︎︍︂︈︁︎︅︋︈︂︃︋︊︊︎︇︋︍︁︇ ︈︇︉︇︋︈︍︄︇︎︋︎︆︇︎︎︍︆︋︁︅︍︋︊︄︍︆︎︋︋︍w︅︂︇︋︉︊︉︈︄︊︊︌︈︉︁︍︌︂︄︄︇︋︆︀︅︁︉︌︆︍i︋︂︌︍︅︂︌︈︀︅︄︁︆︈︅︂︁︌t︆︌︉︃︄︈︀︀︄︍︋︀︂︉︈︍︇︁︄︎︍︊︁︄h︄︆︆︃︁︎︍︃︂︆︍︎︆︎︍︍︉︃︈︈︋︍︈︇︂︂︅︌︅︉ ︃︌︅︋︂︀︊︀︃︄︂︆︎︁︂︄︂︆︎︋︍︂︀︂у︉︈︃︁︌︄︂︌︅︊︍︃︈︆︅︉︃︆︊︁︈︆︍︃︆︆︀︊о︌︎︅︌︀︋︈︎︅︅︎︍︀︊︈︎︋︋︌︈︅︂︂︌︂︋︋︌︀︅︍︈︌u︄︇︃︂︄︈︉︀︁︄︂︁︇︈︆︃︈︄︋︇︆︇︈︎︁︄︊︀︇︊︊︌︀ ︉︋︇︈︃︎︋︅︈︅︎︎︋︉︋︍︃︎︊︄︌︀︇︆︎︃︅︀︅︆︅︄︅︊︅︆︊i︈︉︊︂︉︌︄︆︁︂︁︎︈︆︍︍︈︉︎︍︊︃︄︇︁︄︀︀︎︈︌︌︌︋s︁︊︋︇︋︂︉︁︂︅︉︍︉︉︊︁︅︋︈︌︇︌︄︇︋︅︈︀︁︇︃︆︀︉︇︀ ︂︇︃︍︎︇︉︌︁︈︅︎︍︈︃︆︈︄︎︍︍︊︉︅︄︋︊︊︈︅а︇︊︃︁︋︋︉︂︌︎︄︈︍︉︁︀︀︇︀︆︍︁︂︆︁ ︅︉︋︅︄︍︅︎︎︆︆︎︀︌︀︁︃︎︎︊︊︉︋︌︁b︊︋︎︇︆︃︇︊︀︌︅︎︎︇︆︍︊︍︎︆︇︍︆︈︆о︂︁︋︊︇︁︅︉︍︅︂︉︊︀︅︄︈︋︋︋︋︄t︉︋︆︁︈︉︈︍︊︃︉︀︋︈︃︀︇︃︇.︀︃︊︍︈︁︍︌︎︂︎︄︁︍︁︄︋︆︍︀︄︌︆︇︃︇︀︀︋︎︂︁︂︇ ︄︃︂︍︀︊︇︉︌︅︍︎︌︇︉︎︆︆︍︆︍︍︁︃︄︊︌︅︆︌︁︆︊︃︁
You repeated the exact same line twice in a row, ignoring the content of what I said in the process. I don’t know what you expected. Online, it’s a real possibility.
The exact same line was the point. I didn’t ignore what you said… I disagreed with it.
I disagree with that interpretation. (We’re just doing contradiction, right? I can do the Monty Python sketch thing too.)