• ohulancutash@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Season 2 completed production a couple of weeks ago. SNW has completed production on its final 2 seasons. This is the first time there has been a clear deck with no Trek in development or production since 2005.

    It isn’t necessarily virtue signalling. A new ownership team tends to like having a fresh start on key properties. It comes at the right time, with Kurtzman’s contract up at the end of the year. Financially there’ll be a bit of brinkmanship. If the studio greenlights another Kurtzman Trek show now, they’ll be handcuffed to him for the next few years and his deal will go up in value. Hold off, and they can keep the price down or go for someone else.

    • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      So if it had been popular would it have continued? Serious question, because it sounds like they weren’t going to continue SFA after season 2 in the first place.

      • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        If it were a phenomenon then maybe it would have been continued, but Trek is expensive, and they don’t have Netflix paying for it these days.

        I never got the impression it was a show that would stick around. Obviously it would be limited to 4 seasons anyway without replacing most of the cast, but I think it pretty much wrapped everything up in season 1.