Dazharion@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 3 个月前Not wronglemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square49fedilinkarrow-up1814arrow-down12
arrow-up1812arrow-down1imageNot wronglemmy.dbzer0.comDazharion@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 3 个月前message-square49fedilink
minus-squarelate_list@piefed.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·3 个月前I’d imagine milking them would be somewhat more complex though
minus-squaredalekcaan@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up5·3 个月前Yeah, that’s why I prefer cubic cows. They’re much easier to pack, too.
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·3 个月前Efficiently packing 17 square cows.
minus-squareViking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 个月前This is the Superwaffle Debacle all over again! flips syrup table and leaves
minus-squareotter@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 个月前Certainly easier to get a proper angle on 'em.
minus-squareMinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 个月前I can’t believe we’re having this argument again. Hexagonal cows when two dimensional. Uh, regular icosahedral cows in three, I don’t know the names of the shapes in four but you’ll put your eye out
I’d imagine milking them would be somewhat more complex though
Yeah, that’s why I prefer cubic cows. They’re much easier to pack, too.
Efficiently packing 17 square cows.
This is the Superwaffle Debacle all over again!
flips syrup table and leaves
I do not like this
Certainly easier to get a proper angle on 'em.
I can’t believe we’re having this argument again. Hexagonal cows when two dimensional. Uh, regular icosahedral cows in three, I don’t know the names of the shapes in four but you’ll put your eye out