- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
X-Post from /c/[email protected]
The author raises some good questions about the licensing of the core utils. Why the MIT license? Why not stick to GNU GPL?
X-Post from /c/[email protected]
The author raises some good questions about the licensing of the core utils. Why the MIT license? Why not stick to GNU GPL?
I run Cachyos (KDE), for 9 months now. It’s Arch based. I have had only one problem that I caused myself because I didn’t read the docs well enough. Other than that I have had zero issues and it just works.
It’s the best distro I’ve used (previously ran very early Ubuntu, the SuSe for a while, then Mint).
Cachy is pretty solid. If you can name a distro I’ve at least tried it. Though I would still recommend mint for someone who has no idea what they’re doing and just need things to “work”. But garuda, endeavor or cachy are all pretty solid and straight forward. And with the talk of a new independent graphical package manager for Arch. It’s only going to get easier to operate and maintain.