• MrSmoothPP@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Ah yes, because fictional scenarios of incest relations might as well be engaging in the real thing. If even the Epstein class says it then surely it must be true.

    • wewbull@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 hours ago

      fictional scenarios of incest relations

      Not incest. Step relations are not blood relations. The parents marry and combine their existing families.

        • wewbull@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Which aren’t a thing.

          Two step siblings have no legal relation as far as I’m aware. It’s just two people who’s parents have married. There’s nothing stopping them having their own relationship.

          If you’re concerned about non consensual events, that’s just plain old sexual abuse and rape. That’s completely different.

          • jj4211@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I agree with this sentiment and the concept of ‘step-siblings’ may work as expected when the kids are like 5.

            But if they are instead late teens, well, the parents should be realistic about what happens when you put generally horny strangers under one roof… It should be a risk factor that weighs heavily about joining your families in one household.

          • MrSmoothPP@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Well either way, my point is that engaging in fictional scenarios isn’t the same as acting them out in real life. Anyone who gets their sexual morality and ethics from the Epstein class shouldn’t be taken seriously.