• merc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    The original version of the comment said, I believe “So there is precedence”. That could be fixed as “there is a precedent” or “there are precedents”. I suggested “precedents” because it seems like OP used the homophone for that one. So, “precedents” is correct, “precedence” is not.

    There was fuck all need for that. I actually mostly backed you up in another comment.

    Bruh, you said “Bruh. If you’re going to correct, be sure you’re correct.”, when I was correct and OP was incorrect.