Google confirms its latest update can scan all your photos to “use actual images of you and your loved ones” in AI image generation. That means Gemini seeing who you know and what you do. You likely have tens or hundreds of thousands of photos. They’re all exposed if you update.

      • Imaginary_Stand4909@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        47 minutes ago

        Yeah, but at least it’ll all be outdated and nothing new is added. And hey, maybe in the future we could get laws that force them to delete anything older than a certain date. Would leaving them there be any better?

  • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Does it matter what we do? There’s definitely some family member, friend, colleague who has taken a picture of you and your likeness will be processed.

    It’s like people tagging you in Facebook pictures even if you don’t have an account, but worse, because that was an active step. This is fully automated.

    • Lumisal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 hours ago

      There’s definitely some family member, friend, colleague who has taken a picture of you and your likeness will be processed.

      Hah, I’m good then.

      I’m a vampire.

      • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Actually only DSLRs use mirrors. Every other camera can see you Nightwalker

            • Lumisal@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Don’t know, but in mirrors it looks funky. And I only have a Minolta Maxxum 7000. They don’t build then like they used to.

              I imagine AI finds it even weirder.

    • RichardDegenne@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The main reason why I haven’t moved to Immich is backups. Storage is Hella expensive and there’s no way I store photos without a backup.

      • Toribor@corndog.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Backblaze B2 is about $7 a month per TB.

        Almost every major backup solution natively supports S3 compatible storage.

        • Landless2029@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          $7/month per TB is expensive as a data hoarder…

          Best to scope it down to documents, git and photos.

          The rest gets an onsite backup to externals.

        • markko@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Obviously cloud storage is convenient, but there’s definitely better value in on-site backups.

          That works out to $84/year, which is about what you could get a 1TB HDD for.

          2 x 1TB HDDs in RAID will be much cheaper and reasonably safe in the long run.

          1TB SSDs will be even better value due to their extended lifespans, and you’d get much better speeds.

          • Toribor@corndog.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            58 minutes ago

            I back up to local storage and then replicate offsite to S3 nightly.

            On-prem backups are great and cheap and fast and definitely plan A but a robust backup solution is going to require offsite storage of some sort. Object storage is one of the cheapest ways to do that for most situations, particularly for things that can’t be replaced like photos.

            • markko@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              53 minutes ago

              I’d do the same if I wasn’t so tight with my money lol. I prefer having multiple on-site backups so I don’t have the subscription fees.

              If something bad enough happens to my house that it destroys all my backups then I imagine photos are not going to be very high on my list of priorities.

    • Rookeh@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Same, I set it up a few years ago and both me and my partner have been using it since then with no issues at all, it’s completely replaced Google Photos for us.

      We’ve also set up immich-frame and repurposed an old Google Nest hub to use as a digital photo frame.

      • DontNoodles@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I’ve written a python script that fetches a random image from an immich album using its API, every 30 seconds and sets it as my media pc (Ubuntu) wallpaper. Serves as a frame when no windows are open. Recently updated the code to fetch images only when the desktop has mouse focus, to save unnecessary HDD reads when I’m watching something.

    • lukaro@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Not that difficult to setup either. If I can do it anyone with a keyboard can.

  • lostoncalantha@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    15 hours ago

    GrapheneOS works great for me. Not a lot you can do on stock android that you can’t do on GrapheneOS. I would highly recommend anyone looking for privacy to look into it. Very very easy to install. Just make sure you have a Pixel phone that is unlocked. I’ve been using it as my daily driver for two years now.

    • xthexder@l.sw0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 hours ago

      GrapheneOS isn’t a replacement for Google Photos though? What do you use for photo backups? (Immich seems like the obvious answer, but I’d like to know if there’s more options out there)

      • snrkl@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        It let’s you run Google Photos without network permissions and with storage scopes limiting it to certain folders.

        • xthexder@l.sw0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Does the photo search still work offline? It doesn’t for me. That seems like it’d be the only reason to stick with that app if you’re not using the cloud storage, otherwise I might as well just use a basic file browser.

    • steel_for_humans@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      My only issue is with banking apps and our national ID app which is very useful. I know some work, but I haven’t seen all that I have listed, so I would have to be the guinea pig :) I actually have an older Pixel phone with a shattered screen, I was planning to have it repaired, so I guess that’s where I can test GrapheneOS safely.

    • qaeta@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      6 hours ago

      It’s so easy to install! You just need to be in the 3% of smartphone owners who actually have one! EASY!

      rolls eyes

  • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Why search for a doctor’s appointment when Google has access to all your calendar events. Why search for a party invite when it reads all your emails. And why search for a specific photo of you and your loved ones to create an image, when it sees all your photos.

    They try very hard to sell this as something positive and not the privacy invasive nightmare it is.

    • osanna@lemmy.vg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      Exactly. It’s google. They’re scanning EVERYTHING. Even if you don’t use google, they probably know about you from OTHERS’ devices who are using google.

  • NGC2346@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Timing is insane, i took out everything and put it on my NAS 2 weeks ago. Glad i removed everything.

  • PM_ME_YOUR_BOOBIES@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    It’s also opt in. Although I’d be surprised if anyone commenting here is actually using google photos in the first place.

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      14 hours ago

      It’s also opt in

      For now.

      I’ve been dragging my feet moving to grapheneOS, but shit like this is going to encourage me to make the jump sooner than later

    • yermaw@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      14 hours ago

      There’ll be quite a few of us. I have no idea of the actual demographics or whatever, but a lot of people are here just because they got shafted by reddit one too many times.

  • minorkeys@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Voiding my privacy, stealing my IP and opening me up to liabilities…and tis all legal… fuck all of you who gargled their balls and betrayed your own interests for what amounts to digital toys.

    • thax@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      I appreciate the sentiment. One of the core conflicts I’ve had with family over the past couple decades has been their unrepentant usage of my data on these platforms. As a result, I never take or share pictures. They’ve responded over the years by casting suspicion on me, for not capitulating to the status quo, and for wanting to understand the nuts-and-bolts of technology. I’ve never shared mine nor others’ data. I worked in the data economy for about a decade and still, they’d dismiss my well-founded concerns in favor of corporate propaganda and the ego-dopamine loop. “What do you have to hide?” Dumb fucks.

    • iLStrix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I wish I could do that… I even learned like 70% of the knowledge I would need to do something like that… Now I just need the hardware market to crash, so I can actually fucking afford the hardware to do it.