• HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Really seems like Deepseek is one of the only vendors actually focusing on performance per unit compute power and not just throwing infinite compute power at the problem. Calling it now, when the bubble bursts they’ll be one of the few to make it out with a usable product.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      For sure, they’ve probably dropped more significant papers in the past year than any other groups. It does seem like the mindset in China is very different overall though. In the states, it’s basically a cult at this point where they’re trying to build a god with AGI. In China, it’s just treated like another tool for automation and companies see it as common infrastructure, akin to Linux, that people will build interesting things on. Hence why pretty much all the models in China re developed on open basis. Everybody there seems to realize that there’s no real path towards monetizing the models themselves.

      • audaxdreik@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Gary Marcus has put forward articles theorizing that’s why the LLM/neural network models are so appealing to American capitalists. They at least have the appearance of something that can be infinitely scaled with investment (screw diminishing returns, right?)

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 hours ago

          For sure, I think they genuinely think if AI got good enough they could just cull all the pesky workers at that point, and live like gods.