• GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    18 minutes ago

    The stupidity of these lawmakers is beyond wild. How the fuck is this real?

    I have a similar idea, let’s prosecute the police when they fail to catch criminals and punish them instead. A killer got away? Death penalty for the police officer in charge. That will make the killers think twice!

    Or even better, let’s prosecute politicians when their laws backfire and do more damage than good.

  • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    47 minutes ago

    Wait a second… how can they enforce this legislation when a VPN is masking the user’s location? How do they know a user using a VPN is from Utah?

    Correct me if I’m wrong here, but aren’t the users they’re trying to regulate the exact subsection of users that they don’t have the ability to identify as being citizens of Utah?

    Like if a user appears to be in Utah, then they’re probably not using a vpn. And if the user appears to be from out of state, then they could be using a vpn, but also Utah law doesn’t apply to those people because they’re not from Utah (as far as they know)… So essentially this law can’t actually apply to… anyone?

  • TyrionBean@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    5 hours ago

    This from the people who elected a notorious pedophile, “thinking” that he would find the real pedophiles.

  • fizzle@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I’m so weary of everything getting a little bit worse every day.

    I’m sure we all used to be excited about the future of the internet but now it’s just shit.

    • Flatfire@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Generally speaking, most VPNs used for business are a split tunnel, and aren’t forwarding all of your traffic, just the traffic relevant to your company resources that would otherwise be inaccessible unless you were on-site. So your internet traffic and regular browsing are still sent as if you had no VPN connection at all.

      • neclimdul@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I don’t think that’s actually true. Most route traffic through malware/protection software which would be bypassed by split vpns.

        There are also a number of attacks that target this sort of VPN setup so it’s my understanding it’s generally not a good idea.

      • cmhe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Routing is something you can control client-side. Well at least you can configure that all traffic should be routed over the VPN. If your company provides an exit to the internet over VPN is another issue, but I suppose most do.

  • ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Get a list of every dumbass politician who voted this through, and access their campaign websites through a VPN from a computer in Utah. Boom.

    Self owned.

  • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    8 hours ago

    This is just another dog and pony show. If the company doesn’t have any offices or assets in utah, then they don’t have to care. Utah can censor it’s own internet if it doesn’t like it.
    This law simply has no legs to stand on.

    • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 hours ago

      The point is it will spread. Unless you can convince people to jump to i2p en masse it not going to end well.

      I have to wonder how a webtorrent based setup on Yggdrasil would perform…

    • Snowcano@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Yeah, I was wondering how on earth this would work. If my organization doesn’t operate or host in Utah and they file suit against me why wouldn’t I tell them to pound sand?

    • deathbird@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 hours ago

      But that doesn’t fix this. If someone actually from Utah uses a non-Utah IP to access data in a manner not approved by Utah, they can be held liable. The only way to get around this is, aside from the law being struck down, is for companies out to operate outside the legal reach of the state of Utah, or to act as if everyone in the world lives in Utah. It’s a really bad law.

  • bagsy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Websites need to block all Utah traffic. If their leaders are going to be shitheads, then no traffic for you until you elect new leaders.

  • cley_faye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Remember when we told people “they’ll make it illegal to use a VPN” and we got snarky replies like “it’s not enforceable LOL”.

    The fuck it isn’t. Traffic coming from a VPN? That’s a paddlin’, kiddo.

    They’re not even trying to masquerade it as… oh, yes, they’re still trying to masquerade as a “think of the children!” measure. Those fuckers.

  • spacegoat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    12 hours ago

    The pedophile class has the audacity to dictate access to a utility under the guise of protecting the children