Thomas Shaknovsky botched the surgery of William Bryan, 70, who died on the operating table

According to Shaknovksy’s deposition, after removing Bryan’s liver, the surgeon instructed a nurse to label the organ as a “spleen” – and he also identified it as a spleen in Bryan’s postoperative notes. Shaknovsky later said he had been “mentally compromised” at the time of Bryan’s death, explaining that he was “devastated, demoralized, crying over his passing, felt that I failed him”.

  • mystrawberrymind@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Ok that’s insane, was he drunk or something? But mainly I wanna know what the surg techs and nurses were thinking. Like, wouldn’t you see he was working on the wrong side of the abdomen? Investigate everyone in that operating room IMO

    • kazerniel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Like, wouldn’t you see he was working on the wrong side of the abdomen? Investigate everyone in that operating room IMO

      According to the article the patient was actively bleeding to death at the time, so he (and everyone else) was frantically trying to save his life:

      “It was like a overflown sink that’s clogged up, and I am looking for a fork at the bottom, trying to feel and find the bleed, and I was not able to do so,” Shaknovsky said. He added: “After 20 minutes of struggling – desperately trying – to save his life, that’s when the wrong-site event took place.

    • SacralPlexus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      9 hours ago

      There was a post about this case a month or two ago on Lemmy. I can’t find the link right now, I’m sorry. But in there, someone had posted a link to the case files for the court. You could see summaries of testimony from multiple nurses and scrub techs. The short version was that many of them had strong reservations about the surgeon prior to this case due to other errors. When this case happened, they were all pretty certain it was not the spleen immediately.

            • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              My dude, I run into people who wanted to have that “I’m willing to lose my job over this” fight in the hospital a few times over something that would kill me. And they were on the killing me side. And I know they were willing to take it to losing their job because they did.

        • SacralPlexus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I’m not sure if you mean this generally before the case happened, or if you meant, did nobody try to stop him during the case?

          I think before the case, there were a lot of people who were uneasy with him because of the types of mistakes he was making, although these were generally smaller, less serious mistakes. I think there had been some scrutiny of his practice, but I don’t recall the details.

          During the case, it sounded like there was a complication with bleeding which partially obscured visibility in the operative field. The people in the room knew that the case was not going well because of the bleeding, but it wasn’t until he actually pulled the liver out of the patient that anyone realized how wrong things had gone.