Cultivated meat, precision fermentation, and GMO agriculture are expanding globally as regulators, researchers, and farming industries debate long-term impacts on health, food security, and traditional agriculture.

  • cymbal_king@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    If only there was some sort of Impossible plant-based solution that went Beyond expectations in terms of taste and lower resource use than meat…

    • HubertManne@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 days ago

      I don’t think they go beyone expecations (yes I know the names of the prodcuts) but I will say this. Both white castle and burger king had the options at the same price at times and in those cases the plant based on option was as good or better than the meat option.

    • CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I’m not vegan because I’m not super strict but I’m a very plant based person and sorry but most Beyond products are gross with a gross texture and taste, a few of the products are ok. Most people I know who live like I do don’t really eat many meat substitutes. I treat meat like a rare treat and would always choose to rarely eat meat (no red meat for me ever though) than to eat Beyond products on a more regular basis.

      • cymbal_king@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 days ago

        Yeah, I’m not fully vegan either because it is hard to go 100% in our society and I grew up in a very meat heavy household, takes time to change. I tend to stick more with Impossible for the plant based meat alternatives, especially the ground beef substitute. I find finishing it in the air fryer/convection oven improves the texture a lot. But chickpeas have become a larger part of my diet, they’re pretty versatile.

        • jet@hackertalks.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          That infographic doesn’t make the distinction between arable land and pastoral land. I.e. there are areas we can’t grow crops but can feed ruminates. That breakdown is like 30/70 from the agricultural section of the infographic. FAO Source

          Meaning even if every cow was dead, the crop number doesn’t increase

        • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          your argument is disingenuous.

          you’re blurring the lines between livestock and crop farming when I made it perfectly clear they are independent of each other.

          • cymbal_king@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            They are not independent of each other though. We wouldn’t need nearly as much crop farming if it weren’t going to feed livestock

        • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          so the millions of gallons of water used to grow the plants, the millions of tons of fertilizer washed away in that water, the millions of acres of forest land cut down to grow the crops don’t matter.

          huh, learn something new every day. industrialized crops are good for the planet!

          sarcasm tag goes here

          • Sas@piefed.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            And who are the millions of acres of crops used for? To feed livestock and then get a small fraction of the calories out of it