• Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    If you do anything heavier than just a browser, you’re gonna have issues. I had a bunch of users on 8gb laptops one upon a time. If they tried to run excel, outlook, and chrome at the same time their systems would run like it was 2003.

    • placebo@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      I doubt that web browsing is good either with how modern web apps are built. But regular people might not even realize that something is wrong.

    • juipeltje@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yeah that doesn’t surprise me, especially with how much ram windows 11 needs just to run without anything open. So far 8 gigs still seems to work fine for their usecase, and i didn’t really notice any bottlenecks whenever i was troubleshooting on their machines either. If anything the cpu ended up being more of an issue, the oldest of the 2 had a ryzen 2200g in it, and i noticed it would often spike up to 100% in task manager without doing much. I had to upgrade it anyway since windows 11 required a newer cpu for secure boot, so i put a 3400g in it and now it runs smooth again, still with 8 gigs of ram.

      • Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        I think they changed the frequency adjusting algorithm under the hood with 11. It seems to be much more sluggish on bumping core clock frequency up when a big task happens. I had to go in and lock the minimum frequency to 100% on a bunch of user laptops because they would stutter so badly any time they went from low to high CPU usage.

        Sometimes I miss being a sysadmin, then I remember dealing with windows 11’s eccentricities.