Maybe, but what it was mainly was market segregation in Windows licensing.
Microsoft wants even the cheapest lowest-end devices to ship with Windows because that improves their market penetration, but at the same time they don’t want to lose money by reducing the price OEMs pay for Windows licenses in general.
So Microsoft basically told manufacturers “Okay we’ll give you super cheap licenses to keep your cost down so you can sell to the budget market, but only on super bottom-end devices. On more expensive machines you’ll still pay the full license price”
Which basically resulted in manufacturers all trying to squeeze the most mileage out of that spec cap they could.
Tbf, the 4GB ram limit was partially due to 32-bit architecture still being so prevalent at the time
Maybe, but what it was mainly was market segregation in Windows licensing.
Microsoft wants even the cheapest lowest-end devices to ship with Windows because that improves their market penetration, but at the same time they don’t want to lose money by reducing the price OEMs pay for Windows licenses in general.
So Microsoft basically told manufacturers “Okay we’ll give you super cheap licenses to keep your cost down so you can sell to the budget market, but only on super bottom-end devices. On more expensive machines you’ll still pay the full license price”
Which basically resulted in manufacturers all trying to squeeze the most mileage out of that spec cap they could.