- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- Brave sells Origin to strip added features—a $60 one-time fee (free on Linux).
- Origin removes email aliases, Leo AI, VPN, Wallet, Speedreader, and more via a toggleable panel or standalone client.
- You can buy Origin on Brave Premium or enable the panel at brave://settings/system.
You must log in or register to comment.
Funny - are there any other known instances in the history of software where you have to pay extra to remove actual features?
Also, don’t use Brave.
I’ll keep using it. It’s the best browser out there, FF is terrible and is managed by a shitty, corrupt company which deserves to disappear.
Check out Helium. It’s what Brave was supposed to be. (And it uses Chromium.)
Is Helium or something like it available on iOS?
I’m fine with Brave, thanks.
This has to be a joke right…
Like I can’t imagine any way this could be serious, cause brave literally inserted referral codes to steal money from creators. They also inject ads. Like… you have to be making a joke. There’s no way you’re serious.
The only joke here is the crap browser that FF is. Bye.
Okey bye IE bot. Hope to see ya in a few year when Edge finally reach you… So the IE dumb defender didn’t disappear, they started using brave… This explain so much about how a company with this kind of action against the consumer can survive. They target the old IE fan boy with an humiliation kink.
He was so upset he threw a fit and downvoted anyone who didn’t parrot his ideals
Don’t skip your meds, mate. They can help you avoid blabbering nonsense like this.
Who is the target audience for this? Without those features isn’t Brave just like any other Chromium browser?
It being free on Linux is pretty interesting.
Lmao it’s like the play store tax
What browser should I use then thats not brave or Firefox?
Waterfox, librewolf
Why not Firefox?
you should use firefox and turn off the ‘ai’ crap (one toggle) if you don’t want it. a few more clicks turns off the ‘sponsored’ stuff and ‘telemetry’. if that’s too much for you, then librewolf. zen, perhaps, if you want something a lil’ different.
Konform, Zen, Floorp are solid ones to check out
+1 to Zen and Floorp. Haven’t come across Konform before, thanks!
I use Librewolf so I don’t have to worry about Mozilla adding things and enabling them by default
Safari/Epiphany.
Vivaldi
I use Vivaldi, european and against the AI (and also crypto) hype
Isn’t that just helium browser
In the sense that they are both Chromium? In that case it’s just Vivaldi as well.
a couple minutes to click through vivaldi’s settings will turn off all the annoying stuff (similar to firefox, but firefox is quicker to ‘set up’). i’ve never seen it re-enable things like microsoft loves to do.
vivaldi is what i use for a chromium-based browser when i need to check web client ‘compatibility’; and i like that you can customize the toolbar (like you can in firefox)… i move the back-forward stuff to the right side of the address box, and add the separate search box (so suggestions can be enabled in it but off for searches in address bar).
Afaik Helium is unbraved Brave
Not really, it has some patches from ungoogled-chromium, brave, and others. But it doesn’t use Brave’s ad blocker, bundles uBlock Origin instead.
Is Brave not FOSS? How come nobody has already made a debloated fork of the browser?
There was a fork, it was called braver. I think it got sued and then shut down? Not too sure.
Most of those features are opt-in anyway, so there’s really little to “remove”. That’s just a way for them to fund the development without resorting to deals with Google and the likes or selling users’s data.
Why the fuck would they need to fund development when they’re funded by the antichrist himself?
That has been debunked.
But you’re free to keep believing in FUD.
By the way… I guess you’re fine with Mozilla being in bed with… Google itself?
I never thought I’d meet a homophobe defender brave enough to venture outside their own little pocket fascist instance of lemmy.
Here are some facts:
-
That link does not ‘debunk’ the fact that Brave was funded, in part, by Peter Thiel. It just downplays it.
-
Brave’s funding was a crypto scam, and selling the idea of ‘selling out to advertisers’ to investors.
-
They are so incredibly ‘committed to privacy’ that they keep selling user data and illegally redirecting users.
No, to answer your whataboutism, I’m not fine with the Mozilla board having Google members among others on it. I really hate that they are spending most of their money on not web browser development, and have spent most of their money in the last two years that was ear marked for browser development on AI features the majority of users turn off. But that’s still better than supporting Brenden Eich.
On your point 3 there was a 1 time issue back in 2020 about redirect links from 1 specific site (binance.us). I know a lot of companies claim malicious things were a bug, but considering it only happened once, was restricted to one site, was fixed almost immediately after it was discovered, and had to do with auto fill settings in the address bar from people who had already used brave’s affiliate links; it really does seem more like a bug. Why do you insinuate that they “keep” doing something when there is only this one instance?
Also no where in that link does it mention “selling user data” so that part seems to have come straight from you ass.
I’d address the other points and why they are pretty much meaningless when you dig into the actual stories, but I dont have the time, and trying to explain the reality of brave to Lemmy users is like trying to explain to a dog why they can’t just eat all the food all the time.
But I did want to specifically call out point 3 because you literally just made shit up and a primal part of my brain can not stand dirty fucking liars who lie because they don’t have any actual arguments.
-
You lose all credibility outside of your weird little circles when you use the word “FUD”.
I couldn’t care less if truth doesn’t fit your narrative.
I made no vale judgement on the information you provided, just informing you of the optics.
