That has nothing to do with copyright, if you remove the signature of a famous Picasso art everyone will still know that is a Picasso art but from a random on the internet you’re just making things difficult for the artist to spread their work for NO FUCKING REASON. You’re having more work to just fuck an artist to gain absolute nothing.
imo, people should not be obligated to anything and i dont believe in morals. id like to conclude this discussion since i have nothing more to gain from it. thanks for sharing your opinion though
Wtf are you saying?
That has nothing to do with copyright, if you remove the signature of a famous Picasso art everyone will still know that is a Picasso art but from a random on the internet you’re just making things difficult for the artist to spread their work for NO FUCKING REASON. You’re having more work to just fuck an artist to gain absolute nothing.
posting a comic without the signature is stupid. its not wrong though and the poster is not morally obligated to spread the artists name
I disagree, if the art is good enough for them to share, surely the artists name is as well. Seems pretty cut and dry, morally.
Maybe people should be morally obligated to not do stupid things for no fucking reason.
off to gulag with you
imo, people should not be obligated to anything and i dont believe in morals. id like to conclude this discussion since i have nothing more to gain from it. thanks for sharing your opinion though
Imagine standing for nothing and being proud of that fact.
“ i dont believe in morals” prob the craziest and dumbest shit I’ve ever heard. lol. Off to gulag with you
Defending it when you could just not is also stupid