• wpb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I’m a simple man; I see a comic without attribution, I downvote and report it.

  • Dr_Fetus_Jackson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    I warned my brother-in-law and sister-in-law about that fuckstick more than a decade ago. They laughed at me. Didn’t phase them at all. When the Model Y released, they bought one. When Elmo revealed his full Nazi self (salute and all), they bought one of those bumper stickers. Later, they replace said Model Y with a new one and pull the bumper sticker off the old one and somehow reattach the used bumper sticker to the new one (you can tell it’s the same sticker because it’s all jacked up from being removed from the old car). Oh, and they were early adopters of Starlink. Sucking Nazi cock must be addictive because they can’t seem to stop themselves.

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      22 hours ago

      There was once a point where Tesla was the only viable long range EV. Nowadays there is no excuse - the other EVs on the market are cheaper and better.

    • rbn@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      More than a decade ago I still found Musk quite innovative and inspiring. Politically I think he still supported democrats back then, at least he wasn’t openly fachist. Can absolutely see how people bought a Tesla without anticipating all what happened 5 years back, not to speak of 10++.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      I’m reporting every time.

      Removing attribution is just bad (and should break rules), but smurf accounts usually break instance rules.

      • Gonzako@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        They have a policy of fully removing attribution of all the comics he posts, even going so far as to feed them to LLMs to try and remove hard to crop out artist marks

          • moakley@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            12 hours ago

            As far as I know, none. But it does make me hesitant to post any new ones to Lemmy.

            In all fairness, he seems to have stopped removing the attributions. Still downvoting him every time though.

      • moakley@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        He stopped cropping out the artists and, as far as I know, doesn’t ruin them through AI first anymore. At least not in direct posts. Still downvoting every time though.

    • meowcar420@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      18 hours ago

      fym steal? all digital information should be free. it hurts nobody to copy it.

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        If you post someone’s art and remove their watermark, you are stealing

        I couldn’t give two shits about sharing other’s work, just properly attribute it or fuck off.

          • Krauerking@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Acknowledgement of your peers and recognition for what you put out into the world is not nothing. Stop being an edgelord.

            • meowcar420@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              16 hours ago

              My opinion is, that you should be able to do whatever you want to a digital file. I don’t think it’s wrong to scold the poster for not including the artists name though

              • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                12 hours ago

                Yeah nobody’s arguing sharing digital files, hell I’m an avid pirate myself, but in this case it isn’t just “downloading The Godfather,” it’s downloading it, editing out the credits for literally no reason, and re-uploading it under my account on another site.

                Honestly with something like The Godfather it wouldn’t really matter, but with a much lesser known pet project B movie, even if the creators support piracy they’d like you to at least maybe see their name. This comic would be the latter, while you could safely trim the name off of like, Charles Shultz’s Peanuts, and assume people probably can figure it out.

          • knuk@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            16 hours ago

            There’s income related to making and sharing digital media. It’s not as simple as a simple monetary transaction, but there’s income in social media presence and exposure which can be converted into monetary income. In any case, by removing the signature, the person is intentionally cutting that income stream from the artist.

            It’s more difficult to argue that it’s stealing, since even though the person removing attribution from an artist is taking something from the artist, they’re not necessarily gaining it for themselves.

          • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            17 hours ago

            You are stealing the credit they should get when people who aren’t familiar with the work see it. If you can’t handle that, you’re free to kindly fuck off or get absolutely dog piled for being wrong. As I stated before, I don’t care about content sharing as long as people are properly credited.

            Beep is a well known content thief who actively modifies works to remove the author attribution. That is effectively digital theft, and I don’t give a fuck what you think about the matter.

            • meowcar420@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              17 hours ago

              so you define stealing as not giving somebody something they deserve, based on your personal undefined moral standards?

              • AnotherUsername@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                16 hours ago

                The modified file does not significantly change the work, and does remove attribution. You should spend some time reading up on copyright, intellectual property, and creative commons, because you have obviously not done so if you think this is arbitrary.

            • meowcar420@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              14
              ·
              17 hours ago

              You’re not answering my question. Scrubbing off picassos signature would be different, because it would destroy the physical artwork. I wouldn’t have a problem with someone digitally removing his signature from a digital copy of the artwork and then distributing that online.

              • deathmetaldawgy@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                17 hours ago

                How is that not ruining the art but removing Picasso’s signature would be? I agree art should be free but that doesn’t mean we should make it easier to steal from artists that should be getting paid even if their art is distributed for free.

                If you posted a Picasso piece and went thru the extra steps to remove his signature even digitally & then post it it’s kinda like a ripoff, you’re just unnecessarily removing the credit from the person who actually did the work.

                • meowcar420@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  17 hours ago

                  I didn’t say that removing picassos signature would not ruin the art. I said that physically destroying the artpiece is way different from copying a file and then modifying that copy. Copying digital art is not stealing. This mindset just enables stupid anti-piracy and copyright laws that will always harm the honest consumer

    • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      No, he’s always been a lying, dipshit, con artist, weirdly obsessed with the letter X. A weird obsession with having kids. He sued the original creators of Tesla, so he could have the title of founder…

      Only reason anybody knows he even exists is because Dad’s money. Which ironically is the exact same thing for Trump…

    • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      yes. During his “occupy mars” arc, it was great that there was a rich person that was funding things like electric vehicles, batteries and most importantly , infrastructure, who was also talking about climate change as a serious issue and taking steps for a worst case scenario.

      Then he started unraveling, around the time he started calling the rescue diving guy a pedo.

      • Sarcasmo220@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I dunno, I would argue anyone that hoards at least hundreds of millions of dollars is suffering from some type of mental health disorder.

        • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          IDK. Back then it seemed like he was cashing out his wealth to achieve that shit, which is expensive, so we didn’t think too hard about it. Like if you owned half of pay pal, and wanted to spend billions on infrastructure, it made sense that you’d you know, wait and save before doing that.

          I can’t believe I typed that sentence out like that. fuck me.

          • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            He wasn’t cashing out anything. It was all a ploy for investors. If you look at the valuation of Tesla it is massively higher than any other car company. The Mars stuff was just a push again more valuation for SpaceX. Despite the fact that other scientists including people at NASA saying that his plan was not going to work, everything he said was just a publicity stunt to push investors so he can make an imaginary number go up.

            Also he was fired from PayPal for incompetence.

            • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              yes, thank you captain hindsight. It was nice to have someone building fucking infrastructure and making electric cars seem good.

  • Slashme@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Is there any info on the artist, or did it get stripped out of the comic by beep?

  • itrealgood@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    A bumper sticker is such a token attempt to absolve yourself from responsibilities and embarrassment

    • drekloge@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I still have sympathy for people who bought in years ago and thought they were doing something good. Not everyone is financially stable enough to get rid of a big investment like that. Buying an EV was different 10 years ago.

      That said, anyone with a Cyberstuck or a newer model with the T E S L A spelled out on the back has zero excuse.

      • deathmetaldawgy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        lol I couldn’t imagine having a $30k electric mistake sitting in my driveway, mocking me with Elon vibes. Yikes.

      • ContriteErudite@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        The first time I remember Elon really letting the mask slip was the Thai cave rescue in 2018. After his jury-rigged submarine failed, he publicly called one of the actual rescuers a pedophile simply for pointing out that the project looked more like a PR stunt than a rescue plan. Looking back, it’s easy to see the warning signs, but at the time it’s understandable why many people were still ambivalent about him.

        I wonder how many of these people who believe that Tesla owners who bought their car long before Elon showed his true colors own a Ford. Do they know what kind of person Henry Ford was and the writings he published? How many own Volkswagens?

        In my view, the Tesla and Elon hate are justified because of, well, everything that’s come to light over the past few yars. But all this clamoring that people who still own a Tesla they bought 7+ years ago should have gotten rid of their car is just virtue signaling. If their convictions about this are so strong, then they ought to apply the same logic to any Ford bought after 1920, or any Volkswagen at all.

  • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Tbf if I lived in one of the areas where they were getting vandalized for a time, I’d probably use the “don’t vandalize me bro” sticker too.