• Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    2 days ago

    proprietary protocol that requires licensing and has been behind in every way vs DP

    Hard pass. Only if they axed the licensing fee would I start to consider it as an alternative. Right now it’s just a grift.

  • Romkslrqusz@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    There is an important qualifier, though: devices can be HDMI 2.2 certified without delivering the very fastest data speeds, so you’ll need to study the spec sheets of any potential purchases.

    That’s not going to confuse anyone /s

    What’s the point of having a “standard” if it’s really more of a standard…ish?

    • dudeface@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I can’t see myself upgrading my TV or attached devices for quite a while

      It already does 4k 120hz and that is never used by me, can’t imagine any new TV tech selling me on an upgrade for the next 10 years

    • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Either that or the tech has plateaued.

      I just don’t think bandwidth is a meaningful bottleneck, or will be in the next decade, even.

  • juipeltje@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    As a linux user on amd i’m just happy to hopefully finally get hdmi 2.1 support lol. I’ll probably be good for a long time after that considering 4k 144hz is already hard to drive.

  • Lexam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Will I be able to tell the difference? If not then it’s not going to sale.