• Wispy2891@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    33 minutes ago

    Fine for what? My 8gb laptop was unusable on win11, swapping even at the empty desktop.

  • hexagonwin@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    59 minutes ago

    win2000 ran fine with 64MB of ram and it did everything perfectly. even faster than win11. lmao.

  • skisnow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Windows XP was initially only capable of addressing a maximum of 4GB of RAM in its first 4 years of release, and I can’t think of a single damn thing I want from Windows 11 that XP didn’t already give me. How bloated does this bullshit have to be for 8Gb to be the bare minimum?

  • FireWire400@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I recently went to a large electronics retailer here in Germany and was shocked to see that they’re still selling brand new Windows 11 Laptops with 4GB RAM. Idling at 85% RAM usage.

    Not sure if they’re just getting rid of old stock but selling them with Windows 11 at all is kinda criminal.

  • Mio@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I just hate that the web browser is setting the minimum requirements for memory for an OS today.

  • glibg@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Fine for what? One web page in Firefox and the Calculator application?

  • LemmyLegume@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Yea that should be plenty for all the telemetry, update checks, notification services, and AI slop tooling (Copilot) to run.

    You should be fine as long as you don’t launch any applications, play any games, or attempt to use a web browser or the rest of the computer in any meaningful way.

    We call this the “Jurassic Park Problem” at work. Just because you CAN doesn’t mean you SHOULD.

    • De Lancre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Run linux on it with windows VM, if your memory hungry software supported. Unironically pretty good duo.

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Translation:

    Microsoft admits AI-driven RAM shortage is eating into sales of machines with Windows 11.

  • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    11 hours ago

    8GB isn’t enough for 3 facebook tabs, regardless of how efficient the underlying OS is.

    I’m glad we’re in a spot where we stop buying RAM. It means we stop giving them headroom.

          • skisnow@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            58 minutes ago

            My coworker was making a browser extension recently and noticed that most of Facebook’s frontend code is crazy bullshit designed to make it difficult for scrapers and bots to navigate the DOM.

            The saddest part of it is that none of it is particularly effective, it just means they had to write 2 lines of code to grab the fields they wanted instead of 1, so all that’s happened is Meta have made everything worse for everyone and burned an extra kajillion client-side CPU cycles worldwide, for almost no benefit.

          • De Lancre@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            I had to bump my virtual machine (with win11) for work up to 32gb, simply cause single firefox browser + slack was running out of 24gb after full day of work. Which consists out of opening google office suit like gmail\gsheet and web apps with some internal tools. What a cool world we living in.

    • MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      60
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Windows 11 with 16 also runs like hot garbage, so I’m not sure if it’s a ram issue. I’m sure more ram helps, but I don’t think it’s the main problem. I’ve not used 8 GB in a while though, so maybe some updates really changed things.

      • stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        My work computer is an i9 with 64GB of RAM and it also runs like shit. It’s really noticeable how bad performance is since I switched to Linux full time on my personal systems and have a frequent comparison point.

        • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Well, work machines have increasing counts of security agents. Mine has three and I’ve seen more. Plus Teams which uses enough RAM to run a proper OS all by itself.

          • frongt@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            True. We buy pretty good PCs and they run okay. But if I put vanilla Windows, even Win11, or any Linux, they’re absolutely screaming fast.

        • zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          Exactly my experience. My Linux machines with 16GB of ram run circles around my work imposed W11 machine that has 64GB of ram.

      • 51dusty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        experienced this first hand the other day… fresh boot and the damn thing is using like 11gb. luckily this was not my machine, and I’m on a Mac, but I felt the guys pain.

    • flameleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      15 hours ago

      8GB is enough for Windows 11. Issues only arise if you open any applications while Windows is running.

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I bet if I tried Windows 11 with 128 GB, I would still think it runs like garbage.

    • mesa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Theres online comparisons somewhere on ram/cpu etc… win 11 is VERY bad at 8gb in most cases. Linux at 8gb mostly fly. Hell mac os works well at 8.

      Its just microslop doing their thing.

      • De Lancre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        Hell mac os works well at 8.

        I’m certified apple hater and “all linux” user, but in all fairness - MacOS does amazing job with ram managing. Caching, swap control and i\o priority scheduling made way better than on any linux distro.

    • Magister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      With 8GB you can boot Windows, the OS, no problem, but basically cannot run applications/games. You cannot use it, just stare at the screen doing nothing :)

  • RamRabbit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    16 hours ago

    8GB should be fine for Windows 11. However, the OS is so bloated that it simply isn’t.

    Microsoft should fix that.

    • tomiant@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      They can’t. The spaghetti code base is ancient. You can’t really take anything out at this point because it’s what keeps it alive.

        • Greyghoster@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          The IT press was saying a decade or so ago the Microsoft had lost control of its code base and it would bloat and run like slug. Looks like nothing has changed. Too late to fix it with all the AI tokens in the world.

          • De Lancre@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Any software can be fixed, it just that amount of effort needed for that would be insane in case of windows, so at this point it’s easier to use ostrich algorithm

            • skisnow@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              49 minutes ago

              Yeah we can’t expect them to be able to hire the expertise required for this, it’s not like they made over $1,000,000,000 net income last year or anything. Oh wait…

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I watch a Rerez video where he looks at force feedback flightsticks. These sticks came out around the year 2000, and use ports that modern PCs just don’t have.

      He tried plugging one made by microsoft into windows 11. This stick was made 26 years ago. It just worked. No setup. No drivers. Just, 26 year old stick.

      The reason? They’re still including drivers from Windows ME into Windows 11.

      This is one very niche example, but the 300kb or whatever a driver size is, is being preinstalled in all windows 11 instalations. And Windows 10, and Windows 8, Windows 7, and Windows Vista, and Windows XP.

      I’m gonna guess you can count on one hand the number of people using this flight stick on Windows 11. It only works with a handful of games, because it only ever worked on a handful of games.

      Why would this be included by default on Vista or later?

      Imagine how many thousands of other files are like this. Taking up space, without a reason.

      • Peffse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        15 hours ago

        That… doesn’t make sense. The Windows NT line changed the way hardware and drivers interacted with a new Hardware Abstraction Layer, so a WinME driver wouldn’t load in Win11.

        Additionally, Win7 changed it so that drivers require certification and signature, which I could guess the certification would come in grandfathered, but the signature certainly wouldn’t be there for a WinME driver.

        Why even complain about a 300kb driver sitting in System/SysWOW64, as it isn’t going to reside in RAM until the actual device is plugged in… so it’s actually a good thing to keep. I’m glad they don’t act as the arbiter of what is too old and force people to purchase new hardware when the old stuff still works.

        • frongt@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Well except for that time when they declared Win11 to require a TPM. They dropped 16-bit support a long time ago too.

        • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago

          What I’m saying is, it shouldn’t take up space by default.

          If YOU want to install it, great. You can spend 30 seconds installing the driver. Why force 99.99% of users to take on bloat, when they’ll never use it. Same thing with additional languages. If you speak other languages, great. You install them on your device. No reason I should have French installed on my device.

          Now add the same idea with every bit of software. The OS itself should be bare minimum. Then you can add to your own installation.

      • RamRabbit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        Having the drivers installed is fine and, quite frankly, good; for exactly the reason you point out. When they aren’t being used they are only taking up disk space. And that is OK, nobody is particularly upset with Windows’ disk space.

        It is the RAM usage, telemetry, and other running processes that just don’t need to be running. These are the things that make a Windows setup so bloated. One doesn’t need to reach out and tell MS every time you open the start menu, one doesn’t need Candy Crush and One Drive ads appearing in the OS. There is no good way to turn all that off. That is just using resources and making the OS worse for users.

        • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          It shouldn’t take a measurable amount of time to find the calculator when I start typing “cal” in the application menu. And yet it frequently takes upwards of 10 seconds for anything to show up at all.