The internet is mostly known for being a nightmare for your privacy, but I also think there is another side to that coin. I mean, it is insanely easy (and common) these days to do all your internet communication with messengers, that have pretty much unbreakable encryption (Signal). That was not possible for the average person before computers and the internet. The government could easily read all you private letters.
Also, all our web traffic is fully encrypted with https (although that is more of a security than a privacy thing) and most modern phones automatically do full disk encryption for your files. It is also trivialilly easy to use a proper end to end encrypted cloud storage (proton, tuta etc.) or even use unsafe cloud storage like Google Drive as long as you encrypt your files locally before uploading.
I know, the internet is still a net negative for most peoples privacy, but it is pretty cool how far we’ve come with encryption.
It didn’t matter. The government has limited money for that shit. They couldn’t even spy on everything they wanted to, much less the general population.
There you go, making my point for me. That program wouldn’t be possible without the internet. So encryption became needed by us nobodies because of the internet.
Well, yes. I’m not arguing against your general idea. Just the notion that laws would protect you.
But strictly speaking, the internet isn’t a requirement for automated mass surveillance. Powerful enough computers to analyze and process our phone calls would have sufficed. The internet just happened to predate those.
And yes, it’s always also a matter of ressources. But if you rely on that, your privacy depends on the assumption, that you’re just not interesting enough to be surveilled. Since you had no way to verify that, relying on that notion is somewhat similar to the “nothing to hide, nothing to fear” argument today and yields the protection of your privacy to the decisions of the surveillant.