beep@piefed.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoBring Back Crappy Forums: Web forums were rough around the edges and faded in relevance as seemingly better options emerged. But what if we had stuck with them?tedium.coexternal-linkmessage-square29fedilinkarrow-up1111arrow-down14file-text
arrow-up1107arrow-down1external-linkBring Back Crappy Forums: Web forums were rough around the edges and faded in relevance as seemingly better options emerged. But what if we had stuck with them?tedium.cobeep@piefed.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square29fedilinkfile-text
cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/tech/p/1234765/bring-back-crappy-forums-web-forums-were-rough-around-the-edges-and-faded-in-relevance-a
minus-squareartyom@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down6·1 day agoThe threadiverse is way better than crappy old web forums, and the centralized popular ones as well.
minus-squareFartsWithAnAccent@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up8·1 day agoIt has the potential to be, but it needs more communities and more people working to grow them into active places.
minus-squareHund@feddit.nulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·21 hours agoThreadiverse? Is that a spelling mistake?
minus-squareFeathercrown@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·21 hours agoNo, it’s the part of the Fediverse that uses this thread-based format
The threadiverse is way better than crappy old web forums, and the centralized popular ones as well.
It has the potential to be, but it needs more communities and more people working to grow them into active places.
Threadiverse? Is that a spelling mistake?
No, it’s the part of the Fediverse that uses this thread-based format
I see. Thanks!