• Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’ve heard of the stats; I’m just curious how they address it and how much better (or worse) similar storage with hydro and pumps would be.

      • r3plic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Well, this 80% efficiency is what they are targeting not what the system will do. The test system Energy Vault build in a MUCH smaller form factor had a round-trip efficency of 75%

        The EVx ™ system is projected to achieve an impressive round-trip efficiency exceeding 80%. Source

        Only time will tell if they can reach 80% with a bigger system or at all. If they actually manage this it would be a decent alternative to Hydrodams in areas where these are just not possible since it would be a similar round-trip efficency.

        Pumped storage systems have a round-trip efficiency of about 80%, which is competitive with battery storage. Source

        In my opinion these systems are inferior to fly wheel energy storage (can reach up to 90% round trip efficency Source) but might still be an option depending on price.

        • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Pumped hydro almost always will make more sense because, for one, we’ve got pumps and pumping, and water storage VERY figured out. And water storage, well. Thats just a great co-benefit to have from the system.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Fly wheels are pretty cool too, it could be that this is just easier to build and maintain though. I imagine the primary considerations are around how cheap it is to produce and whether it holds enough energy to make it worthwhile.