JPDev@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · edit-210 months agoFitbit Clock Faceprogramming.devimagemessage-square16fedilinkarrow-up129arrow-down10
arrow-up129arrow-down1imageFitbit Clock Faceprogramming.devJPDev@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · edit-210 months agomessage-square16fedilink
minus-squareM0oP0o@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·10 months agoThis is a pinetime it looks like. You should get one, open source and $30.
minus-squareramsay@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-210 months agoDoes it support the watch command? user@watch:~ $ watch now Otherwise, who knows when “now” was… /s
minus-squareUnRelatedBurner@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·10 months agou sold me if it has hearthrate and stuff (idk what tracks sleep)
minus-squareToRA@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·10 months agoI would not say that any of the features work well enough to consider them as actual features. The only thing that is truly reliable is telling time. My battery life is about 3 days. The notifications are ugly and bare minimum. It does not store more than 5 at a time.
minus-squareCosmic Cleric@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·10 months ago I would not say that any of the features work well enough to consider them as actual features. That is a bold statement. I as someone who was considering purchasing one, could you elaborate?
minus-squarePsythik@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·10 months agoWatches should be round IMO. I’m happy with my Samsung Watch 4 Classic.
minus-squareAceticon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·10 months agoYeah, but square screens are way cheaper to procure and to program for, and every little helps in an open source project aiming for $30.
minus-squareSwedneck@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·10 months agohonestly just depends on what kind of watchface you want, square is cheaper and in some ways more convenient so if you don’t want an analog clockface there’s no reason to bother
This is a pinetime it looks like.
You should get one, open source and $30.
Does it support the
watchcommand?user@watch:~ $ watch nowOtherwise, who knows when “now” was…
/s
u sold me if it has hearthrate and stuff (idk what tracks sleep)
I would not say that any of the features work well enough to consider them as actual features. The only thing that is truly reliable is telling time.
My battery life is about 3 days. The notifications are ugly and bare minimum. It does not store more than 5 at a time.
That is a bold statement. I as someone who was considering purchasing one, could you elaborate?
Watches should be round IMO. I’m happy with my Samsung Watch 4 Classic.
Yeah, but square screens are way cheaper to procure and to program for, and every little helps in an open source project aiming for $30.
honestly just depends on what kind of watchface you want, square is cheaper and in some ways more convenient so if you don’t want an analog clockface there’s no reason to bother