• kibiz0r@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Who do they think will be using the AI?

    AI threatens to harm a lot about programming, but not the existence/necessity of programmers.

    Particularly, AI may starve the development of open source libraries. Which, ironically, will probably increase the need for employed programmers as companies accrue giant piles of shoddy in-house code that needs maintaining.

    • wewbull@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Who do they think will be using the AI?

      Well that’ll be junior developers, until they get hauled over the coals for producing highly repetitive code rather than refactoring out common themes.

    • r00ty@kbin.life
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think there will be (and there already have been) significant downsizing over the next few years as businesses leverage AI to mean the same work can be done by less people paid less.

      But the job cannot go away completely yet. It needs supervision by someone that can see the bullshit it often spits out and correct it.

      But, if I’m honest, software development seems to be targeted when I think design writers should be equally scared. Well, that is if businesses work out that AI isn’t just chatgpt. A GPT or other LLM could be trained on a company’s specific designs and documentation, and then yes designers and technical writers could be scaled right back too.

      Developers are the target because that’s what they see chatgpt doing.

      In real terms a lot of the back office jobs and skilled writing and development jobs are on the line here.

      • kibiz0r@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        My pessimistic take is that everyone in society will get recast as the “human feedback” component of whichever flavor of ML takes over their domain.

        8 hours a day of doing your domain’s equivalent of captchas.

    • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I can’t wait for my future coworkers who will be coding with AI without actually understanding the fundamentals of the language they’re coding in. It’s gonna get scary.

      • Patches@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I guarantee you have coworkers right now coding without understanding the fundamentals of the language they’re coding in. Reusing code you don’t understand doesn’t change if you stole it from Stack Overflow, or you stole it from Chat-GPT9.

        • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          The code on SO is rarely specific to what the use case is IMHO. Any code I’ve gotten from there has had to be reworked to fit into what I’m doing. Plus I can’t post some stuff on SO because of legal reasons but can on an internal ChatGPT portal.

          Trust me, it’s gonna get a lot worse.

          Matter of fact, I look forward to the security breaches of developers posting company code into ChatGPT for help lol. We already had that issue with idiots posting company code into the public GitHub.