• Brewchin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    This is the way.

    Terrifying that it takes state intervention to do this most basic of things. Fuck this timeline.

    • Mereo@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      8 hours ago

      And the fact that it is a debate tell you everything about the state of the world today… sigh

  • chillpanzee@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    They could solve this problem and a bunch of others by banning the surveillance and collection of user data without consent.

    • pemptago@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Can’t help but imagine this would result in having to “read” and sign a 70 page ToS and 30 page Privacy Policy before we can buy groceries.

      • Stinkywizzleteats@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        sounds like a job for foss AI. I’m sure a ToS specific model running on a CPU would be more than enough. I think that’s what Pegasus does and I’m sure there are more. copy and paste, get a ELI5, then decide.

        edit: I bet someone could flimflam it into a browser extension.

    • Jack@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      How dare you question the orphan-crushing economy!

      This comment sponsored by Torment Nexus Inc.

  • Hello_there@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 hours ago

    More perfect union did a few stories about this. Beware the bill that looks like it helps but secretly opens the door to doing the same thing. Basically, don’t believe what you see until someone you trust says it will actually help.

    • bluGill@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Don’t trust it until lawyers have had months to examine the exact wording. Loopholes are to easy to hide. Often a other wise good bill will have something awful in it such that you must oppose the whole

  • pemptago@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    For those not in NJ trying to avoid this, pay in cash and punch in a random phone number at the register.

    You may need to try a few numbers at self-checkout to find a working one, but it’s surprisingly easy. Rotate the numbers to dirty up the data of these parasites.

    • rollin@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      er what? Are you saying people in US have to enter their phone number every time they buy stuff??

      • adarza@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 hours ago

        “loyalty cards” are common. stores (and each of their 369354764 data sharing “partners”) get to track everything you buy and when. in exchange, you get token “discounts” on a small selection of products. some stores have done away with the actual physical cards, and use mobile phone apps or just the mobile phone number to track you.