• farmgineer@nord.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The problem is, the best educational institutions, best-paying jobs, and most quantity of open positions are in that area. Without spreading that out, you won’t get the people who would rather live elsewhere out. We do have worker shortages here in the countryside, but they’re often manual labor which people are less keen on.

    • comrademiao@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I doubt you’ve been or lived here if you think it’s very dense for a large city. Frankly its extremely spread out. Most buildings are quite short or single family homes. Compared to the skyscrapers of Chinese cities, its a lot closer to American suburbs.

    • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      *there is other city. Singular.

      Supposedly there is a third city, but it’s too boring to be worth checking.

          • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            18 hours ago

            Please explain how that’s wrong?

            Japanese nouns don’t have grammatical number. The closest you can get is adding an affix like -tachi, but even then it’s almost exclusively for people and means more like “and company” rather than a true plural.

            The noun for “city” is 市 (“ichi”), and it can mean either one city, two cities, or many cities. You can specify how many by adding a number, but the word itself doesn’t change.