If I understand it right, the moderator of the mastodon.world instance has blocked several posts by Hasnain Kazim, as Kazim reported yesterday on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/661473263/posts/10163657720033264/

Kazim is a quite famous and successful book author in Germany and something between left, conservative and liberal. He was journalist for the most important German weekly news magazine Spiegel. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hasnain_Kazim?wprov=sfla1

Canceling his posts is stupid and certainly completely exaggerated. To me from the external perspective it seems that the moderator is abusing his power. He is damaging free and respectful discussion. Furthermore, when a famous person like Kazim reports those experiences to his broad audience, who do not understand the functioning of the fediverse, the moderator also damages Mastodon in general significantly, it seems to me.

What do you think about this case ?

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    That was the only article I could find about him too.

    It gave plenty of examples of him trolling bigots, almost nothing about him being a journalist except something he did for a student paper as a teenager

    It seems very likely that he was fucking around and got banned for trolling.

    • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Nope. He was simply stating the fact that arabic-language comments in international media have a large majority of people celebrating the guy who weaponized his car and killed people at Berlin Pride with it, and that this was a large problem. After that comment was deleted, he cited it with the additional comment that he had been censured by the mod and that this was pretty astounding.

      This means that the Mastodon.world mod neither likes when it is shown up that arabs are celebrating when someone kills gay people in germany, and that he has very thin skin regarding critique towards his moderation style.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        After that comment was deleted, he cited it with the additional comment

        So, if we take you’re unsourced opinion as fact…

        1. He had a comment removed

        2. He reposted the same comment with even more “context”

        3. Mods banned him

        And now you’re shocked and want people to be outraged because Mastodon worked as intended?

        You want us to…

        Do what exactly? Stop using the instance none of us are using? Go yell at a mod because they did what they volunteered to do?

        • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 hours ago

          The perp wanted to join ISIS, you really think the same social group that danced in the streets after 9/11 is unable to praise someone running over gay people?

          https://www.reddit.com/r/atheism/comments/1v8u3xo/seeing_many_muslim_justify_even_blatantly_support/

          Deleting his comment means the mod either agrees with ISIS, or would rather silence others who condemn these reactions than stand with them. The ban makes me think more about the first category.

          I just wanted to set the record straight. He didn’t pull the reactions of these people out of his ass, and he was communicating that this is a dangerous development. (might be inviting copycats) And he’s right! Everyone celebrating this hates gay people - it is gravely concerning, similar to neonazis praising a perp when they murder an immigrant.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Oh wow…

            People still using reddit said inflammatory things?!

            Next you’re going to tell me everyone on twitter is actually the same person as their profile pic.

            • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              The people using arabic in online comments are of course not 100% arabs, but i’d bet 80%+are. And i am pretty sure that if you concentrate on those using arabic in international media who are fine with gay people dying, that this percentage gets a lot closer to 100%.

              • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 hours ago

                There’s billions of Muslims…

                So you could literally show me 10s of millions that are dicks, and I’ll say that means thos 10s of millions of people are dicks.

                I wouldn’t say that means all the billions of Muslims are dicks.

                You could sub “Muslim” for any demographic, my logic would stay the same because I’m not a fucking bigot.

                • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  If you ignore how these cultures abuse and kill their LGBT population with death sentences based on religious law, you are a bigot, because you wouldn’t be that lenient if for example catholic italy would do the same.

                  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    3 hours ago

                    Again:

                    The actions of even 10s of millions doesn’t give you a reason to judge all 2+ billion.

                    It’s based on “religious law” by the interpretation of extremists.

                    Something shared with the other two Abrahmic religions and multiple others.

                    But at this point you are being explicitly bigoted and don’t have ignorance as an excuse

    • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      They banned him for trolling bigots!?

      Come to MULTIVERSE! We love left wing trolls! Come sign up and tilt some bigots!

        • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Probably more accurate to say he got banned for attempting to circumvent moderation. He was moderated for Islamophobia.