• WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    How decidedly retro of them! Next they’ll sell watches you actually have to wind up every day to keep time!

    • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Actually, there are completely mechanical self-winding watches. They’ll never need a battery as long as you wear them occasionally.

      • IMALlama@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I went this route a year or so ago. Wait, that was three years ago now? I should have never checked.

        I’ve owned a few smart watches over the years and got tired of things failing. Bands splitting (remember the Microsoft band?), batteries degrading, cases splitting due to swollen batteries, etc.

        The only downside is that straight analog watches will drift some over long enough time periods, so you will occasionally need to adjust them by a minute or two.

      • Uranium 🟩@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        This is one of those things that has no impact on my normal day to day, but is still absolutely mind blowing any time it comes up

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      I would just get one of those cheap digital watches. They don’t have any wireless capabilities and the battery lasts forever. (Mine has the original battery and it is around 15 years old)