• Godort@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I maintain that this should be the default behavior and the AI be opt-in

        • Fizz@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          AI is the future of search and I dont see anyway that changes. The user experience of AI search is way to good, average users love the summary at the top of their search. Almost every report i’ve seen shows over 50% of people using AI for search and that tracks with what I see in people i know in real life.

          I’m a DDG user and I do not want them to handicap themselves to pass a purity test.

          • AstralPath@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Then opt in. We shouldn’t have to opt out to avoid padding the AI numbers.

          • XLE@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 hours ago

            AI is the future

            Thought terminating cliches are the future of online discourse.

            The user experience of AI search is way to good

            Search engine companies went out of their way to make normal searches worse, and then introduced AI search to keep you on their sites.

            I thought everybody at this point understood enshittification at this point, but if not: of course a project at the first stage of enshittification acts better than a different product at the third stage of it.

          • Zarobi@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Personally I actually like the A.I. summaries… IF it shows its sources. That way it essentially acts as it should, a summary of the search results, and I can click the link that actually is relevant to what I wanted to find in the first place. It skips that step where you have to open the first 5 links and comb through them to find which one is the useful one.

            I know most people don’t click those links and just trust the summary directly, but it’s important to me personally. Unfortunately those links only appear sometimes, often you just get plain text with no links.

          • PRIMEcavitationfetishist@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            Its wrong though. Its wrong so fucking often. There’s no way to fix that. I stopped using ddg because of this. Pandering to right wing idiots does not necessarily mean being smart, that’s thatcherite Nazi coddling lies.

        • XLE@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Exactly my thoughts.

          DuckDuckGo enjoys default search engine status on a lot of browsers, and many of them make it difficult to set a custom one. Especially mobile browsers, and apparently even Safari makes it a pain.

          • XLE@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            5 hours ago

            This comment is unnecessarily dismissive and unhelpful.

            If people don’t care, then they won’t care if it’s gone either. And that’s the better option.

            • wrinkle2409@lemmy.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              5 hours ago

              If enough people were that bothered about a box with an AI overview, it wouldn’t be there. Simple as that. The thing is that the overview turns out to be helpful in some cases, despite what the haters think.

              • morto@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Recently, my mom killed one of her plants, because she searched for something to use as organic fertilizer and the ai summary suggested to add coffee grounds mixed with water daily. She realized it was a fake information and isn’t trusting anything from internet searchers anymore. I wonder if at some point it will happen to most non-tech people, and search usage will go down heavily.

              • XLE@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                5 hours ago

                No, the act of a company shoving something bad down people’s throats does not prove it’s what they wanted. You should know this.

                We have polls that have calculated people’s sentiment. They are sick of AI .

                • wrinkle2409@lemmy.cafe
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  11
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  Ok, if people hate AI so much, you’ll see it being gone soon. No company would want to spend money keeping an useless feature, principally DDG, which is no monopoly.

                  Also, that poll is about Americans, I don’t give a shit what Americans think.

    • evenglow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      DuckDuckGo has taken a clear stance on generative AI and other LLM-based tools, having asked users whether they wanted AI results fully integrated into search. An overwhelming majority said no, which is why the company now keeps AI content and interactions confined to a separate page.