• Dessalines@lemmy.mlM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Thank you for your service.

      Some people including OP are completely missing the point of torrenting, which is to share, not leech. If everyone removed their torrents like the OP, everything would quickly become unavailable and die.

      IMO a better strategy is to just limit your global upload speed. Then at least you’re still making everything healthy and available, even if its distributed slowly.

      • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 months ago

        If everyone torrented like OP, then no torrent would ever become unavailable and die.

        Since they keep seeding until 2 users have the torrent.

      • IronTwo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Noobie question: Is keeping my PC running to seed torrents taxing on the HDD or would it shorten its lifespan?

  • emhl@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    9 months ago

    if you snatch a popular torrent that is fine but with dying torrents that is quite harmful

    • Jenoki@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’m considering getting a seedbox because with my current storage setup, and my unwillingness to keep the vpn up all the time 2.0 is the best I can do.

        • Fisch@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 months ago

          I use Gluetun for that. It’s a docker container that sets up the VPN and qBittorrent in two containers and routes all traffic from qBittorrent through the VPN.

      • Rustmilian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        If there’s no one left to seed, the torrent dies. Seeding back at least 200% ensures the torrent stays healthy.

        • ZeroEcks@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Sometimes you need to seed back more than 200% because the other two people might not be able to seed it back. I would generally not set a limit

      • blindsight@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        If there are less than 5 seeds, then I keep seeding indefinitely. Above that, I’ll consider deleting it to free up space once I’m done with the media.

        Unless it’s from a private tracker, in which case I’ll just seed everything forever to get the sweet bonus points.

        • Catsrules@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          How does that work, does the downloader just cycling though seeding torrents or do they all stay active? I feel like there would be so much torrents over time it would slow everything down.

          • blindsight@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            I looked it up, and qBittorrent can easily handle hundreds of torrents, apparently. I haven’t noticed any problems running 180-ish. I’ll probably try to keep it capped to 300 or something like that.

            • Catsrules@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Does it matter how many files are in each torrent?

              I would think a 100 file torrent would be more intensive than a 3 file torrent.

              • blindsight@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                I don’t think it has any effect at all, but I’m not an expert. It’s just sending data by request based on hashes and indices, isn’t it?

      • Dessalines@lemmy.mlM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Seeding doesn’t take up more space, unless you were planning to delete the thing, which doesn’t make much sense.

        • Jenoki@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 months ago

          In my case - of course it takes up space that would otherwise be free. I only get what I immediately use and I mostly don’t need it anymore directly afterwards. If I’d only seed as long as I need the file I would never reach a ratio of 1, let alone 2. So yeah, a ratio of 2 leaves enough space for me to work with, while giving back double then what I took. I don’t see the problem.

        • ex_06@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          unless you were planning to delete the thing, which doesn’t make much sense

          Why not? You keep every film every episode every-thing you consume?

      • NateSwift@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Seeding doesn’t take up space, as long as it’s on your disk you should seed it.

    • Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Lots of people don’t have the storage space to keep every piece of media that they download. Once it’s been watched or listened to, it’s deleted.

      Depending on the torrent, it’s faster to consume it than to seed it.

    • TheOneCurly@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I use the *arrs to make a well named hard link to the file in my media library right after the download completes. Then they can be removed from the torrent client after appropriate seeding time/ratio.

    • DreadPotato@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      No point in keeping the torrent if I no longer have the file. Unless it’s something I know I will re-watch/use multiple times, I delete the file after I’ve used it.

  • Exocrinous@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I don’t understand why everyone’s looking down on OP for giving twice as much as they take.

  • notannpc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’ve made it my mission to use as much data as possible since my ISP forced me to pay more when they implemented some arbitrary data cap. Gots keep seeding until I run out of space to store content!

  • Discover5164@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    my ratio limit is 250… just because at that point i want to seed something else that is in queue.

    but i have upload capped at 30mbps, this way i do ~1TB upload per day.

    i can’t leave it uncapped or my ips will come knock on my door. but that’s on me for torrenting from a public ipv4 without any vpn