My Lemmy Oracle
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Mysteriarch ☀️@slrpnk.net to Technology@beehaw.orgEnglish · 1 year ago

To comply with DMA, WhatsApp and Messenger will become interoperable via Signal protocol

techcrunch.com

external-link
message-square
108
fedilink
213
external-link

To comply with DMA, WhatsApp and Messenger will become interoperable via Signal protocol

techcrunch.com

Mysteriarch ☀️@slrpnk.net to Technology@beehaw.orgEnglish · 1 year ago
message-square
108
fedilink
To comply with DMA, WhatsApp and Messenger will become interoperable via Signal protocol | TechCrunch
techcrunch.com
external-link
Meta today is offering more details about how it plans to make its messaging apps, WhatsApp and Messenger, interoperable with third-party messaging
  • Kir@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    Would this mean I could finally ditch what’s app and use only Signal?

    • nachtigall@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, Signal announced they won’t implement interoperable messaging.

      • DavidGarcia@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        kind of dumb they could get huge market share

        • anlumo@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          36
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, this worked so well for XMPP when everybody federated with Gmail chat.

          • Barry Zuckerkorn@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Well, it worked out for Google when it federated with Jabber, who first open sourced XMPP.

        • muhyb@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          30
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not. There is no privacy if you send your message to Whatsapp servers.

          • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            22
            ·
            1 year ago

            There’s even less privacy if I have to have the WhatsApp app installed on my phone to send that message.

          • InfiniWheel@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            1 year ago

            You have the big plus of not having the WhatsApp app installed and snooping around with all those permissions it has.

          • n2burns@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Would it not be E2EE? Isn’t that one of the reasons for using the Signal protocol?

            • muhyb@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yes, the “delivering” part would be E2EE. Do we really know the afterwards if they can read their users’ messages? They probably can.

              • falsemirror@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                1 year ago

                Whatsapp CANNOT read messages when e2ee is enabled, this client-side snooping was discussed when the protocol was first implemented. Whatsapp collects a ton of metadata and social graph info, but not message content.

              • n2burns@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                Sure, but any messaging app (including Signal) could have these backdoors in place. Heck, there’s even vectors for unrelated apps on your phone to read this data once unencrypted.

                • bleachisback@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Signal clients are open-source.

                  • n2burns@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Signal is only officially distributed through Google Play, so their APK isn’t reproducible, and I believe it still contains binary blobs.

                • muhyb@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  That’s actually true. We don’t know the real-time server code of Signal. Though other apps cannot read what’s written inside Signal, that’s the good part. I prefer private server + Matrix but Signal is the easiest for regular people.

            • authorinthedark@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              if i remember correctly, it would be E2EE (WhatsApp and Messenger are too) but Meta stores the encrypted message on their server

        • helenslunch@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          Signal does not care about “market share”, they’re a non-profit.

          • ViciousTurducken@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Them being nonprofit has nothing to do with the pursuit of marketshare. Plenty of nonprofits want to maximize marketshare. Them being nonprofit means they are mission-driven.

            And what is that mission?

            Per the Signal Foundation’s website:

            Protect free expression and enable secure global communication through open source privacy technology.

            • helenslunch@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              1 year ago

              Them being nonprofit has nothing to do with the pursuit of marketshare.

              Um, of course it does? LOL

              Them being nonprofit means they are mission-driven.

              And what is that mission?

              Let’s talk about what the opposite of their mission is: Mainly operating as a source of data collection and revenue for a corporate surveillance and advertising agency.

              Do they want more users? Sure. Are they going to compromise on their core principles out of convenience for their users? Abso-fuckin-lutely not.

      • ViciousTurducken@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Source?

        • nachtigall@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          https://www.androidpolice.com/signal-threema-nothing-to-do-with-whatsapp-eu/

          • kfet@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ugh, an ad-block force wall. No visit.

            • imkali@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              What adblocker are you using? It doesn’t appear for me.

              • kfet@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                The built-in ad blocker of the Vivaldi browser

                • imkali@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I’m using Firefox + uBlock Origin and don’t have a paywall.

                  • kfet@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    You sure it’s not disabled for AndroidPolice.com? I’m still seeing it.

    • spdrmx@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not if signal doesn’t want to support WhatsApp, and I don’t think they’re going to unfortunately :(

Technology@beehaw.org

technology@beehaw.org

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

  • Free and Open Source Software
  • Programming
  • Operating Systems

This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 189 users / day
  • 911 users / week
  • 2.67K users / month
  • 7.83K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 39.5K subscribers
  • 3.48K Posts
  • 56.2K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • alyaza [they/she]@beehaw.org
  • TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org
  • gyrfalcon@beehaw.org
  • rs5th@beehaw.org
  • coldredlight@beehaw.org
  • Leigh@beehaw.org
  • TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social
  • Chris Remington@beehaw.org
  • BE: 0.19.5
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org