• MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      I didn’t take it as a correction. More of a clarification. I omitted some extraneous detail that they added. I felt it was implied well enough by context that it didn’t need to be said, obviously they wanted to add more clarity to the statement.

      In my mind the two statements are identical, except that mine relies on context and theirs is a bit more explicit in what is said.

    • krashmo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I don’t think that’s phrased as a correction. It clearly wasn’t as you noted

      • JungleJim@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        “clearly wasn’t”

        I see now, you just phrase things abruptly in a way that SEEMS rude but clearly isn’t. My mistake. Have a nice day.

        • krashmo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          You figured out what it meant. That’s clear enough for communication purposes imo. You’re welcome to your own interpretation though