movie-web was just taken down with all its repos, Yuzu was taken down, then suyu forked it on gitlab and was taken down, countless clones of nintendo games, platform emulators, and a bunch of other things are taken down because they are hosted on the clear web.

If you’re a dev and planning to write software for piracy, host it on I2P!

  • mbirth@lemmy.mbirth.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    7 months ago

    Just don’t use public and free services like GitHub or GitLab. Setup your own webspace with a trusty provider, install Gitea/Forgejo and host the code yourself. It’s that easy!

    • Azzy@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Not Gitea, they got bought by a for-profit company or something

      • mbirth@lemmy.mbirth.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        So far nothing bad has happened and the company was founded so they can sell support hours to businesses. Just like lots of other companies behind Open Source projects do it. 🤷‍♂️

      • mbirth@lemmy.mbirth.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        DMCA is only valid in the US. Those other countries obeying it are usually just doing it to avoid trouble, but there’s no real legal obligation. (But if ignored, it is pretty safe to assume that any bigger company would look into local laws and try to find a different way.) But from what I’ve heard, hosters don’t just close your account because of some DMCA. They will actually look into it and work with you to solve it.

        And in the end, you could simply host it on a Raspberry Pi at your home. The ISP can’t be held responsible for the data you transfer, so they won’t just shut down your Internet connection. And if you get a strongly worded letter from some company, you can send it directly to the recycling bin.

  • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I remember trying to play with I2P back in the day and it being slow. Now I wouldn’t even know how to access it. Is there something I can read or watch that can reintroduce me and teach me the basics?

    • onlinepersona@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      https://geti2p.net still exists.

      I2P is still slow, but that’s because there aren’t many nodes. It is faster than a few years ago though. I can get download speeds of 100 KB/s or more. It’s like TOR in the early days with mostly private nodes and few hosted nodes. It’s easy to get a VPS and host and I2P node for a fiver a month or less.

      Anti Commercial-AI license

  • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    7 months ago

    What’s the advantage of I2P over Tor? It’s been a while since I used I2P, but it always seemed like “Tor with more open ports and higher CPU usage” to me.

    It’s important to note that if you set up Gitlab over any kind of hidden service, you disable CI/CD systems, because a CI/CD pipeline doing a HTTP call will easily de-anonimyse the server. Set up appropriate firewalls and disable any features you may not want, or you’ll easily find yourself de-anonymised!

  • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    I2PD is an implementation is I2P, a way to anonymously share Disney’s IP without showing anyone IP to the ISP.

      • 🦄🦄🦄@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        7 months ago

        Thanks! I think it would be a good idea to add a short info blobb directly in your main post tho :)

        • floofloof@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          https://geti2p.net/en/comparison/tor

          Perhaps the main differences are:

          • Unidirectional tunnels instead of bidirectional circuits
          • Fully distributed and self organizing
          • Packet switched instead of circuit switched
          • Tunnels in I2P are short lived
          • i2p puts an emphasis on communicating within the network, whereas Tor puts more emphasis on communicating via the network to outside

          Together these provide some additional resilience and protection against traffic analysis compared to Tor, arguably improving security.

        • PirateJesus@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          7 months ago

          Different purposes. Tor was intended so you could access the real web anonymously.

          I2p the whole thing is an anonymous web. Everybody is a node. Tracing a packet never ends because you can’t be sure you found the origin of the packet. Which only gets worse the longer somebody remains connected to i2p. And it even can handle torrenting, a torrent client is built in.

          I2P sadly gets a lot less funding/support.

  • ShadowCat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    just skimmed through that link and it seems like it’s for self hosting gitlab ? is there an instance on i2p so I don’t have to self host (I don’t want to) ?

    • onlinepersona@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      If you know TOR, I2P is TOR but with P2P support.

      But in general terms, it’s anonymization network. Data is sent over multiple hops/nodes and the original source is not included. The nodes are hosted by random people. The downside is that the slowest node in the chain of nodes between the source and the target means that’s how slow the entire chain is (at least). So, the more nodes, the better for anonymity, and the faster the nodes are, the better for speed.

      Anti Commercial-AI license

  • Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    A side question : I’m making a similar protocol, anyone knows some space where you discuss stuff like I2P, IPFS etc?

    They all have their pros and cons, and I’d like to see if my protocol and its possibilities would interest.

    Cheers