Album on lemmy.ca, beehaw.org, shit.itjust.works & lemmy.world

  • 0 Posts
  • 210 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 7th, 2023

help-circle

  • The English Bible itself is a translation. It didn’t say John in the originals.

    The name is ultimately derived from the Biblical Hebrew name יוחנן (pronounced [joχanan]), short for יהוחנן (pronounced [jehoχanan]), meaning “God was merciful”.

    It’s dependent on the translation what they decide to use.


  • Ivan is the Slavic relative of the Latin name Johannes, corresponding to English John and originates from New Testament Greek Ἰωάννης (Iōánnēs). The Greek name is in turn derived from Hebrew יוֹחָנָן (Yôḥānān), meaning “YHWH (God) is gracious”. The name is ultimately derived from the Biblical Hebrew name יוחנן (pronounced [joχanan]), short for יהוחנן (pronounced [jehoχanan]), meaning “God was merciful”. Common patronymics derived from the name are Ivanović (Serbian and Croatian), Ivanov (Russian and Bulgarian), and Ivanovich (Russian, used as middle name), corresponding to “Ivan’s son”.




  • Depends on the docs but if they’re written well you’re best served by reading them in full. Rftm before looking at best practices and tips.

    Problem is a lot of people don’t understand how to read a doc. There’s a terminology, phraseology, syntax. I have so many instances of people who say they didn’t see the answer in the docs and then you look and it’s right there. But the human mind tends to discard info it doesn’t understand how to process.

    If you think you know how the Internet works but haven’t read the RFCs you might not know as much as you think you do. Read pretty much every one on ipv6 because the second hand resources are absolutely garbage.















  • No one really flies a 747 in a modern world because 4 engines are less efficient than 2 engines…and gas is really expensive so it increases your ticket price inordinately compared to a 777 which can hold less people but get those people there cheaper. Think dollar cost per seat.

    You have some 747 cargo jets still which can get away with it due to it still being one of the best for moving a large number of heavy goods.

    Basically…it’s a white elephant. Now they own a depreciating asset that they cant get rid of and has a massive upkeep cost or a high cost of fuel.

    DJT said it’s the DOD’s…but the DOD doesnt need a 747. Maybe they can make it into a new AF1. Keep in mind the current AF1 looks like a 747 but it’s really a VC-25 - a military variant. There’s already an open contract with Boeing to replace it with the new VC-25b since the current plane is 25-30 years old.