Of course not, they can already lock up terrorists forever, and they’ve got plans to label anyone who thinks of stepping out of line as Antifa(read: protesting, specifically, but it won’t stop there), which they’ll label as a “Terrorist Organization”.
That’s fair.
To that end, they’d have to start banning all the 24-hr talking heads from being able to call themselves news channels and regulate the term.
As it stands there’s no way to flip the counties that that’ll just listen to that drivel all day telling them to vote against their own interests.
It means that votes are diluted such that it’s nearly impossible for the state to turn despite the fact that most of its voters have.
And while, yes that isn’t mutually exclusive to Texas, we weren’t talking about them were we?
It’s just a way to ensure that a sizeable population isn’t adequately represented.
Population density:
Political Leaning
Districting:
Or, maybe it’s because they’re gerrymander’d to shit?
Tyranny by majority…
They only would have ‘broken the law’ in this case if they tried to sell it as their own original work, which it isn’t, and that is what the prompt writer in the op is trying to do.
Before YouTube’s switch to “your going to watch 6 ads before the video starts, and you are going to like it,” schtick, I always enjoyed getting to skip the ad before they managed to tell me what the product even was.
This one might also be good for anyone wanting to make smallish battle maps for a tabletop game, since it has a ‘directly overhead’ camera mode.
It doesn’t need to be an animated visual to be distracting or NSFW…
That’s a lot of faith that the ads would be SFW, let alone not distracting.
Not only that, but then they go and blow half of their budget on adverts instead of R&D.
While, yes it is not copy and paste in the literal sense, it does still have the capacity to outright copy the style of an artist’s work that was used to train it.
If teaching another artist’s work is already frowned upon when trying to pass the trace off as one’s own work, then there’s little difference when a computer does it more convincingly.
Maybe a bit off tangent here, since I’m not even sure if this is strictly possible, but if a generative system was only trained off of, say, only Picasso’s work, would you be able to pass the outputs off as Picasso pieces? Or would they be considered the work of the person writing a prompt or built the AI? What if the artist wasn’t Picasso but someone still alive, would they get a cut of the profits?
The art isn’t being made btw so much as being copy and pasted in a way that might convince you it was new.
Since the AI cannot create a new style or genre on its own, without source material that already exists to train it, and that source material is often scraped up off of databases, often against the will and intent of the original creators, it is seen as theft.
Especially if the artists were in no way compensated.
My trackball mice have had parts deteriorate at around the two year mark before. After this one breaks, usually the scrollwheel or the left click key, I’m switching to an opensource trackball system.
Especially when one of the loudest religions actively want to doom the world so that their sky daddy can show everyone else how right they were this whole time…
The phrase itself doesn’t matter, they are just listening for some indication of human speech at the start of the call.
If nothing is said, then the system believes that it is a machine doing the same thing.
Provided, of course, that their spam system doesn’t just starts playing a recorded message anyway.
Iirc, that’s usually a sign that the robot caller has found a machine on the other end, since most people first respond with some sort of greeting right off the bat.
Sounds like a company that needs to be dissolved.
I’ve heard that done Tesla models have laminate glass on the doors, like they make the windshield, making most glass breakers ineffective.