• 0 Posts
  • 266 Comments
Joined 5 months ago
cake
Cake day: February 22nd, 2026

help-circle





  • Market the company and, for smaller companies that want funding, beg and network.

    Leadership is often removed from how work actually gets done. This is part of why they often make bonkers decisions.

    They don’t understand that most of the time isn’t going into typing code into the computer. It’s figuring out what the product guy and CEO actually want. It’s pulling answers out of them (eg: what do you want to do if the user’s name is null?) or dealing with it when they don’t like your decision (eg: you didn’t say what to do when I don’t have their name, so the email just says “hey”. I really don’t think this is a crisis)



  • I think there’s a difference between like a landlord and a property management company.

    Property management that fixes stuff, cleans up common areas, and such adds value. They do labor that’s useful.

    A landlord that just gets money because they legally own the place is not adding value. That’s what most people hate.

    You can, of course, have horrible people assigned to manage the property.









  • I wouldn’t do it based on join time. Age doesn’t always map to quality, and it might encourage people to make sleeper accounts to age up.

    I would do it based on a graph of trust.

    Let’s say you’re user 0. You trust yourself. You can then invite or vouch for a user. If they misbehave, it should reflect badly on you. If they post good content, you should share some of the glory. If one of those users invites someone, the good and bad flow upstream.

    People no one has vouched for have very little power. You can filter them out with a toggle.

    You’d be able to see the web of behavior. If someone keeps inviting or endorsing assholes, then they’re a problem.

    Endorsing is different than upvote. You can upvote whatever, but endorsing is saying you trust this person and you’re willing to put your own reputation and access on the line.

    Something like that.


  • Workers skeptical of unions in a survey of 1,900 tech professionals conducted by the career site Blind cited specific concerns: that unions are “not meritocratic,” “prevent innovation,” and “hold back earnings of top performers.”

    Looking at my non union job where idiots make millions and it has taken years to get even the basics of ci/cd implemented.