

Well, they’d be supporting their local businesses for that I’d hope!
Hi I’m a human, maybe a furry, not an AI. Also ‘‘venia_sil’’ on Fedia.
Sometimes my posts are licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. Contact if looking for a licensing deal.
Website? Website.


Well, they’d be supporting their local businesses for that I’d hope!


if you make your service available in Australia you must comply with Australian laws,
How does this even work? This is among the stupidest arguments I’ve ever heard on the internet, at about the same level of flat-earthism.
Are you saying if I am in Italy, selling Italian good on an Italian shop set in an Italian street, and an Australian tourist sends an agent to walk the Italian street and buy a thing for them from my Italian stand, I am somehow beholden to Australian law? This but “oN tHE iNtErNeT”?


pretty ridiculous
In the good way, yes. Who was it the admin of a Lemmy instance, I think, who said he would receive alcohol as a form of ID verification because to even acquire it legally in the first place you have to be of age, anyway? That’s pretty much golden and incentivizes the local economy!
Amazing. is Perl like, the countable infinity of unreadable languages or smth?
omg there’s stuff worse than Perl out there?
This looks somewhat like perl…


Still doesn’t make sense. One company is turning to AI so that drives you to other companies that already have AI and are precedentally worse?
I’m not saying Mozilla is a saint. The sooner we can replace the executive branch, the better. But the even better comparative is if somehow we don’t even need to get to that point in the first place, and not supporting Mozilla at the past edge of where they’re at is defo not gonna lead to that.


Looking at the situation and deciding that prefering Chrome would be better is exactly the bot position to take.


Agree! I hereby propose that Google forwards US$1000 to the developers each time the AI signals a bug. Don’t even need to write it off as expense, it’s just “investment on QA”.


ffmpeg devs can refuse the AI generated bugfixes for all we care. What I’m heading at is if Google is going to spend AI on posting a problem, then they should also post the solution. At their own expense.


if Google has the resources to put AI to slop bug reports, then it also has the resources to put AI to also post the fixes. So, they should get going. No one owes Google of all corporations free labour.


Haven’t tested piefed myself (laaaaazy here) but it doesn’t hit me much as more-centralized-than-not compared to, say, kbin (mbin now?) offering a sorta similar perspective. Am I missing out on something?


Different conversations in different moods and cultures on the same subject are something completely human and normal, and tech should not work to undo this. When we have seen tech undo this is with social media silos, after all.
Which is to say, any “solution” that integrates those conversations into one view should be, where possible, client-side only. That way I can opt in to view some conversations as unified or not, depending on eg.: how well do I know the context, or whether the OP is a person known for cross-posting (and to where), while at the same time not forcing everyone else to have their culture of conversation subsumed into essentially an attempt to make topical subreddits.


Installed from the internet, it’s downloaded. Installed from a local source (storage, adb) it’s
sideloadedinstalled.
Fixed that for you. Why would the local, direct installation method be the “side” one? Have you become that terminally online?


Not sure if anything else happened since
Well, immediately since, the board supported the CEO’s support for Trump; but I don’t recall anything of note since then.


Nothing unexpected from a company that openly espouses fascism.


What? And let loose what is basically an opportunity for a bribe?


Those things are not related. You are thinking of wage.
Pussy Throat! These Russian agents are really going the Deep Throat route…