• fallingcats@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      2 days ago

      According to the arch wiki: Audacity #Tenacity_fork

      In May 2021, after the project was acquired by Muse Group there was a draft proposal to add opt-in telemetry to the code to record application usage. As an alternative tenacity was forked by a group of volunteers as open-source software.

      Doesn’t sound like they actually went through with it?

      • Underwaterbob@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Doesn’t sound like they actually went through with it?

        They did not. I use Audacity regularly on more than one platform. It collects no data from me. It also hasn’t received an update in years, but still does exactly what it needs to do, and does it well.

        That said, I hadn’t heard of Tenacity until this thread, and it looks like I shall be migrating over to that anyway. Better safe than sorry.

        • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          2 days ago

          It also hasn’t received an update in years

          Wherever you’ve been using it from likely hasn’t been official then because Audacity got it’s most recent update 3 days ago. Muse group is still working on it but I don’t trust them.

          • Underwaterbob@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Hmm. You are correct. On both my Windows and Linux machines, I am on Audacity 2.4.2. I’ve been using it for years, now. I never changed my sources, and it never stopped working. Haha!

      • racemaniac@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        None actually happened, and they just wanted to track which features were actually used to be able to see how/where to focus their efforts in audacity.

      • bstix@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        I think of it as finished software. It’s the MS Paint or Notepad for sound. No development necessary.

        The only reason I’ve used it is because Adobe bought CoolEdit and started “developing” it, a.k.a.: Turned it into paid bloatware and changed the name to Audition. So, I found Audacity which is free, small, to the point and quick to use.

        If you do need more features you’d probably be better off switching to something else in the first place.

      • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        2 days ago

        Welcome! If you want to read about it here you can, they supposedly backpedaled and “it’s not that bad” but there is zero trust in those private owners.

        • windpunch@feddit.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          I remember reading some articles saying that they backtracked.

          I can’t judge how careful the people saying “Audacity is evil” are regarding privacy. I’m not saying you’re wrong, I’m just interested in your thoughts.

          MuseScore is owned by the same company, Firefox is worse (as the article mentions)… Do you not use either of these? Do you use one of these but not Audacity? If the second one applies to someone, what would be the reason? As a matter of principle? Something else?

          (I mean, I don’t know of a FOSS alternative to MuseScore.)