I’m very curious of which distro users loves the most that they have it on their daily hardware?

  • esteemedtogami @lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 days ago

    I just installed Bazzite about a month ago and love it! Used Ubuntu in the past and it was ok, but eventually went back to Windows. I definitely don’t feel that way about Bazzite though, I think I might stick with it as my primary OS!

  • steeznson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 days ago

    I use Gentoo and I love it. The installation process is a bit more complex than Arch but it doesn’t have to be if you choose the precompiled kernel.

    The package management is extremely flexible and the community are great. I have a morning routine where I log onto my gentoo desktop before work and update everything; would compare it to raking one of those miniature buddhist sand gardens. Very theraputic!

    • steeznson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      Have got Debian on an old thinkpad too because it is too under resourced to compile everything. I think Debian is amazing for a solid, reliable distro if you have weak hardware.

  • Fliegenpilzgünni@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Fedora Atomic, especially Bluefin, Bazzite and Aurora.

    Nearly unbreakable, very reliable and stable in everyday use, needs no maintenance (updates itself, etc.) and more!

  • monovergent 🏁@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    Debian Stable. Predictable, low-maintenance, and well-supported. From time to time, I think about switching over to Alpine or even BSD, but the software selection and abundance of Q&A posts for Debian and its derivatives keeps me coming back. Having been a holdout on older Windows versions in the past, I’m quite used to waiting for new features and still amazed at how much easier life is with a proper package manager.

  • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 days ago

    If there were a universal answer to this, there wouldn’t be any others.

    I myself currently use Debian (testing), have for some years now, but I have used other distros in the past too.

  • JustMarkov@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    MX Linux is the best, obviously. Otherwise it wouldn’t be #1 on DistroWatch, right? /j

    • bruhSoulz@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      Why are fedora and suse often not mentioned considering theyre not forks of anything? (as far as im aware)

      • lancalot@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Historically, (at least for hobbyists/enthusiasts) Fedora and openSUSE have been a lot less popular compared to Arch, Debian and their derivatives. While not necessarily representative, Boiling Steam’s chart -in which ProtonDB’s data is used- does indicate to this as well.

        Just my 2 cents.

        • bruhSoulz@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Kinda crazy considering fedoras perks and accessibility tbh. Dont know much ab suse tho as i have very little experience with it

          • lancalot@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            I don’t know why, but openSUSE has had difficulty garnering popularity overall (aside from Germany).

            A possible explanation, which also ties in to Fedora, is how both are the open source variants to corporate distros; SEL and RHEL respectively.

            Arch and Debian are more community-driven by comparison.

            For Fedora specifically, people couldn’t regard it as anything but a testing bed distro; especially if you see how back2back they were with adopting new technologies like PulseAudio, systemd, Wayland, GTK 3/4, PipeWire etc. To be fair, openSUSE was the first to default to Btrfs and auto-snapshotting with Snapper*. Fedora was also facing competition from industry darling CentOS; similar code base, but a lot more stable.

            Thankfully, since a couple of years now, Fedora has recognized that it’s not cool to expect your user base to be sadistic. And together with the (unfortunate) downfall of CentOS, Manjaro and Ubuntu - Fedora has amassed a very healthy user base. And with how quickly Bazzite is becoming the face of gaming Linux (at least until Valve releases SteamOS), I don’t think it has even peaked yet.

  • I use fedora-based atomic distros for the reliability and security. Nothing else really runs SELinux out of the box and I care about security so that’s a necessary baseline. I roll my own distro though using BlueBuild, and base it off the SecureBlue image of Silverblue. Just using SecureBlue gets you nearly to what I use though

  • hperrin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 days ago

    Fedora, but I wouldn’t say I’m in love with it. It frustrates me the least. No Linux distro is perfect, but they’re all better than Windows.

  • Destide@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    The best for my user cases atm

    For work bluefin For general stations mint For gaming cachyos or bazzite