In the piece — titled “Can You Fool a Self Driving Car?” — Rober found that a Tesla car on Autopilot was fooled by a Wile E. Coyote-style wall painted to look like the road ahead of it, with the electric vehicle plowing right through it instead of stopping.

The footage was damning enough, with slow-motion clips showing the car not only crashing through the styrofoam wall but also a mannequin of a child. The Tesla was also fooled by simulated rain and fog.

  • LemmyFeed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Don’t get me wrong, autopilot turning itself off right before a crash is sus and I wouldn’t put it past Tesla to do something like that (I mean come on, why don’t they use lidar) but maybe it’s so the car doesn’t try to power the wheels or something after impact which could potentially worsen the event.

    On the other hand, they’re POS cars and the autopilot probably just shuts off cause of poor assembly, standards, and design resulting from cutting corners.

    • FiskFisk33@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      15 hours ago

      if it can actually sense a crash is imminent, why wouldn’t it be programmed to slam the brakes instead of just turning off?

      Do they have a problem with false positives?

      • endeavor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        if it was european made, it would slam the brakes or swerve in order to at least try and save lives since governments attempt to regulate companies to not do evil shit. Since it american made it is designed to maximise profit for shareholders.

        • FiskFisk33@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          I don’t believe automatic swerving is a good idea, depending on what’s off to the side it has the potential to make a bad situation much worse.

          I’m thinking like, kid runs into the street, car swerves and mows down a crowd on the sidewalk

          • endeavor@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Its the cars job to swerve into a less dangerous place.

            Can’t do that? Oops, no self-driving for you.

      • Whelks_chance@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I’ve been wondering this for years now. Do we need intelligence in crashes, or do we just need vehicles to stop? I think you’re right, it must have been slamming the brakes on at unexpected times, which is unnerving when driving I’m sure.

    • Krzd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Wouldn’t it make more sense for autopilot to brake and try to stop the car instead of just turning off and letting the car roll? If it’s certain enough that there will be an accident, just applying the brakes until there’s user override would make much more sense…

      • Dultas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        False positives. Most like it detected something was off (parking sensor detected something for example) but doesn’t have high confidence it isn’t an erroneous sensor reading. You don’t want the car slamming on brakes at highway speed for no reason and causing a multi car pileup.

    • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Normal cars do whatever is in their power to cease movement while facing upright. In a wreck, the safest state for a car is to cease moving.

    • 74 183.84@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I see your point, and it makes sense, but I would be very surprised if Tesla did this. I think the best option would be to turn off the features once an impact is detected. It shutting off before hand feels like a cheap ploy to avoid guilt

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        13 hours ago

        … It shutting off before hand feels like a cheap ploy to avoid guilt

        that’s exactly what it is.

    • T156@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Rober seems to think so, since he says in the video that it’s likely disengaging because the parking sensors detect that it’s parked because of the object in front, and it shuts off the cruise control.