• robdor@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Riders are instructed to cross their legs and ankles while riding the slide, though the McGuinnesses claim Disney did not instruct them why this safety measure was necessary.

    The impact of The Slide and [Emma’s] impact into the standing water at the bottom of The Slide caused Ms.McGuinness’ clothing to be painfully forced between her legs and for water to be violently forced inside her," the suit reads, adding that Emma was taken to a nearby hospital for treatment and later had to undergo surgery to repair gynecologic injuries after “she experienced immediate and severe pain internally and, as she stood up, blood began rushing from between her legs.”

    Maybe listen when employees instruct you to do something.

    • 3laws@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      While that’s a fair point, it will not absolve Disney at all. Clearly the design is absolutely ass for it to be this life-threatening to begin with.

      This is 101 corporate apologia. Exact same vibes of old lady (with severe burns) v. McDonald’s.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The problem is that the attraction of the slide is that riders can get up to 40mph and then splash into a pool.

        There’s an element of risk with any thing that gets you going that fast. Combined with the failure to follow safety directions….

        That said, Disney will settle out of court for medical bills and some extra to cover additional damages just to keep this shit out of the public.

      • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, the McDonald’s situation had previous documented warnings to the company that their policies regarding maintaining coffee temperatures that high were a safety hazard that they chose to ignore.

        The article says that employees advise every rider of what they need to do for the safety briefing. Have there been other injuries on this ride previously? I can’t find anything with a quick search and the article doesn’t seem to mention anything about previous issues until this woman ignored the safety advice.

      • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        A lot of things, amusement rides particularly, are life threatening if you don’t follow instructions.

      • BoofStroke@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Some things carry risk. The risk is mitigated by proper use and following instructions. Can’t do that or accept the risk? Get out of line.

    • Mossy Feathers (She/They)@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, you’re not wrong, but there’s the difference between, “it’ll hurt” and “you’re going to have to go to the hospital because it’ll be like shoving a power washer up your vagina.” Someone might be willing to risk the pain out of convenience or because they want a funny picture, but they’re not going to do it if it’ll result in a hospital trip. If you’re going to have dangerous rides, then you should be informing people about why they’re dangerous to stop people from trying to apply “common sense”, attempt “funny stunts”, or just be lazy.

    • Drusas@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree, but this ride is unsafe if it can cause such horrible injuries due to how the customer is positioned.