𝔻𝔼𝕍𝕀𝕃𝕀𝕊ℍ@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 4 个月前Absolutely Legendlemmy.mlimagemessage-square30fedilinkarrow-up1312arrow-down19
arrow-up1303arrow-down1imageAbsolutely Legendlemmy.ml𝔻𝔼𝕍𝕀𝕃𝕀𝕊ℍ@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 4 个月前message-square30fedilink
minus-squareMyNameIsRichard@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up7·4 个月前Yeah, but to fair, we had comprehensive manuals.
minus-squareMyNameIsRichard@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up3·4 个月前 For the Atari ST, although I actually preferred Hisoft Basic.
minus-squareOldMrFish@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·4 个月前That C book was still used when I studied software engineering in the 2010s. It was even considered a ‘modern’ C book because it had been updated to include ANSI C…
minus-squareMangoCats@feddit.itlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·4 个月前 had comprehensive manuals You must not have coded for DOS.
minus-squareMyNameIsRichard@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up3·4 个月前At home, Atari ST and at work IBM System/38 where the manuals had their own office.
minus-squareMangoCats@feddit.itlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·4 个月前I had an Atari 800, and the manual for it was pretty complete. At office in 1991 I started programming for IBM PCs in DOS, that was a big step into the void.
Yeah, but to fair, we had comprehensive manuals.
I remember these.…
And …
And…
And now, this:
For the Atari ST, although I actually preferred Hisoft Basic.
That C book was still used when I studied software engineering in the 2010s. It was even considered a ‘modern’ C book because it had been updated to include ANSI C…
You must not have coded for DOS.
At home, Atari ST and at work IBM System/38 where the manuals had their own office.
I had an Atari 800, and the manual for it was pretty complete.
At office in 1991 I started programming for IBM PCs in DOS, that was a big step into the void.