Starlink operator SpaceX is fighting Virginia’s plan to deploy fiber Internet service to residents, claiming that federal grant money should be given to Starlink instead. SpaceX is already in line to win over $3 million in grant money in the state but is seeking $60 million.

Starlink is poised to benefit from the Trump administration rewriting rules for the $42 billion Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) grant program. While the Biden administration decided that states should prioritize fiber in order to build more future-proof networks, the Trump administration ordered states to revise their plans with a “tech-neutral approach” and lower the average cost of serving each location.

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    they hate you. always remember. they hate your entire existence. they’d literally crush you in a hydraulic press if they could. giving you pain is the only way they feel a semblance of happiness.

  • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Capitalism breeds innovation and advancement, folks!

    Also didn’t Rupert Murdoch also stifle fiber adoption in Australia because better internet would cut into his TV and print empire there?

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 hours ago

    the Trump administration ordered states to revise their plans with a “tech-neutral approach” and lower the average cost of serving each location

    In other words don’t give the tax payer the best options you can, give them the cheapest options to implement you can.

    • Jhex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Do something about it then…

      PS: maybe you are, if so, Kudos to you… but the majority seem to only rue it

        • stringere@sh.itjust.works
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          Electronic Freedom Foundation has a Take Action page.

          • Creativity & Innovation; Tell Congress: Throw Out the NO FAKES Act and Start Over
          • Privacy; Congress Can Act Now to Protect Reproductive Health Data
          • Privacy; Congress Can Act Now to Protect Reproductive Health Data
          • Free Speech; Congress Shouldn’t Control What We’re Allowed to Read Online
          • Creativity & Innovation; Tell Congress: No to Internet Blacklists
          • Free Speech; The TAKE IT DOWN Act Will Censor Legal Speech Without Helping Victims

          All campaigns: https://act.eff.org/action

          Or become a member and support their efforts financially.

          MEMBER BENEFITS Your 12-month membership sustains EFF’s legal work, development of privacy-enhancing technology, and public activism 365 days a year. We’re pleased to offer a few benefits as a token of our appreciation!

          EFF member perks include:

          • Annual Member Gift
          • EFF Member Card & Bumper Sticker
          • Digital Member Badge
          • Members-Only Email Updates
          • Discounts on EFF Events
          • Members-Only Speakeasy Invitations
          • EFF Online Shop Discount
          • Membership Renewal Reminders
          • Discounts on No Starch Press books, McSweeney’s Quarterly, and more.
  • Onsotumenh@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    Reminds me of the German Telekom and their unceasing effort to slow down state subsidised fibre deployment.

    The subsidies are primarily for towns left behind with bad ADSL (it was below 30mbit average and is now afaik 100mbit), that want to build their own local fibre nets cause nobody else does.

    They seem to watch for construction permits and then swoop in and build a few fibre adsl distribution boxes or elevate a street or two with fibre to raise the average speed in town just above threshold. The local net looses the subsidies and usually stops construction or if already built only commercial customers are still allowed to be connected…

    • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Reminds me of the German Telekom and their unceasing effort to slow down state subsidised fibre deploymen

      Capitalism is a disease.

    • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 hours ago

      It would be a shame if some random accident were to befall those token distribution boxes…

    • ComfortableRaspberry@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I love it when they reopen construction sites where cables from other carriers were recently buried (after Telekom said no) because NOW they want to provide their shit there too.

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 hours ago

      When we got cable TV and proper broadband internet with it, the previous company relying on the local monopoly got extremely pissed. Every of their services costed the multitude of what competitors, even on phone line, could offer. Most outrageous was ADSL. Competitor ADSL started at HUF5 000 for 384k download speed, topped at HUF15 000 for 2M, per month. The local provider? It started at HUF20 000, for a laughable 256k download speed. Explanation? The parent company thought it was a luxury, because you could just send a hand-written mail instead of the e-mail, get a dish TV with HBO and a tape recorder with a timer instead of torrenting movies, etc.

    • PushButton@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 hours ago

      If they could put that brain power to innovate on their product instead of innovate on how to fuck people, that would be great!

  • thatcrow@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Keep in mind, the cost of businesses to control politics is woven directly into the prices of their products and services.

  • abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    “Hey, can we provide Fibre broadband to our residents?”

    “No, we got a lot of money from Sattelite providers, eat shit and die.”

    Hey, this seems familiar.

    • haych@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      I’d rather Starlink just be independent from Musk. There are people who just can not get a good Internet connection and rely on it, and other Satellite Internet companies are awful.

      I hate Musk as much as the next person, but Starlink is brilliant and works well. If they got rid of Musk and stopped being dicks like they are with this, it’d be okay.

      • andallthat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I don’t know how much Musk can be separated from Starlink. Not only because Starlink, as part of SpaceX, is privately held but also because the main reason they now have a superior service to offer is that they got fucktons of money from government customers, which is also tied to Musk’s action

        A big part of Musk’s involvement with politics is because everything he does, from EVs to rockets to, now, big energy-guzzling datacenters for AI, needs a lot of government backing, if not in terms of direct contracts at least in terms of regulation and incentives.

        Even his direct involvement with Trump wasn’t because he suddenly became a Nazi (he’s probably always been one, according to his own family) but in order to become even more entangled with government investments, even trying to control NASA directly.

        And not only US governments. I remember Musk suddenly being everywhere in Europe pitching Starlink. Meloni’s government in Italy was grilled for allegedly agreeing on a big contract with Starlink.

      • warm@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Id rather all this space trash burn up and we just spend the money on providing internet via land.

        • Kage520@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          8 hours ago

          It’s still a good thing for cell coverage in remote areas for hiking emergencies though. The few satellites that currently do that are stupidly annoying and expensive to use. You have to carry specialized equipment, and if you use Garmin, you pay a yearly fee for the privilege of signing up for the low tier plan, then a monthly fee for the service, and then pay by the text message after the first few. Starlink just added T-Mobile so if you have a newer phone and use T-Mobile you can skip all of that and message out in emergencies without all that nonsense. Hopefully more brands will be added soon, but I don’t know.

          • nymnympseudonym@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Not just for hiking emergencies.

            Many of us in reasonably functioning democracies have had a few decades to forget that sometimes people want to destroy your civilian infrastructure. Far fewer of those people have the capability to disrupt a satellite grid.

          • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Life is not safe. Adventure even less so. The loss of the night sky and the risk of Kessler syndrome is not outweighed by a slight convenience allowing influencers to stream video and hit social media while pretending to get away from it all.

            • 5gruel@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 hours ago

              What a weird hill to die on. Is it about letting people die or about influencers livestreaming?

              What about comms during catastrophies? Small villages or off-grid houses? Remote research installations?

              I swear, Lemmy is becoming more reactionary by the day.

            • Kage520@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              It’s not for streaming. As far as I know it’s just text messages. Absolutely agree we should not be using screen time when out and away. We just need that little bit of safety.

              • blargh513@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 hours ago

                There are also hand held radios, strobelights, flares, and PLBs that do not require more satellite infrastructure.

                People being lost in the wilderness is not a new problem. It often happens because people don’t bother to consider that they might get lost and plan appropriately.

                Sorry, but not everyone gets to come home, especially if they don’t do a little planning.

                • Kage520@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  Ehhh agree that it frequently happens from poor planning, but I think we should do what we can to improve safety rather than blame victims. Learning about and paying for obscure satellite tech only helps those people who already know a lot about hiking, whereas this could bring the tech to everyone with a phone.

                  But also I think they could do it with a lot fewer satellites than this. They don’t need absolutely great coverage. Just a message service. The government could provide this on an emergency basis.

                • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 hours ago

                  People should learn to navigate if they’re going into the wilderness, and face the consequences if they don’t. People will call for additional safety until we all live in padded cells. Frankly, people could stand to face a lot more danger in this world. Maybe then idiots will stop trying to pet the bears at Yellowstone. There’s no need to litter the sky with satellites so that the incompetent can live a bit longer.

          • warm@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Or we could just make satellite phone service more accessible? Without the need for thousands of pieces of space trash put into LEO? Nobody needs tiktok when they are climbing a mountain in a remote area.

  • ruuster13@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Starlink is literally his plan to rule the world. If you singularly control access to the internet for everyone, you’ve won the information war… against everyone. The good news is his Nazi addict ass will likely die young from a chest-cavity attack.

    • iglou@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Good luck having that shitty tech win over Europe, where fiber is proliferating particularly quickly. We all know satellite internet cannot come close to the speed and reliability of fiber.

      Plus we hate Musk.

      It’s good for remote areas and at sea, it’s shit everywhere else