• Zagorath@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Interestingly, the earliest example of this meme listed on Know Your Meme is “junior react developer”, “senior react developer”. So this meme seems to have come full circle.

  • oyfrog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    15 hours ago

    You forgot the part where you step on the rake in different ways to see which one whacks you in the face the fastest.

  • Ephera@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I’m currently prototyping a macro to help reduce boilerplate, as part of a more general library. And I’m doing some wild shit, like defining the fields of a data type from the parameter list of a function.

    But then, yeah, what I’m now stuck on is that my generated code references a data type under one name, but it’s actually got a different name in the public API. All the wild shit was smooth sailing, but a technicality now fucks me over. 🫠

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      15 hours ago

      BTW you missed a colon at the end of your if statement on line 341. Also you used irregular whitespace on another line, but I’ll let you find that one yourself, as a treat.

      • argueswithidiots@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I’ve so far avoided using LLMs unless I need something explicitly explained. I don’t know enough to be able to verify any code it would produce, so I don’t know what the hell these vibe coders are doing.

        But I’m also a little long in the tooth to be starting this, so maybe that’s part of my problem.

          • argueswithidiots@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            I am aware of what I don’t know, and having something which hallucinates produce something I want to use seems silly. I wouldn’t be able to verify it independently because I’m not smart enough. It just seems like asking for trouble. Like I would ask the thing which gave me broken code in the first place to fix it? Smort.

  • Zagorath@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    15 hours ago
    Transcription

    The stepping vs jumping on a rake meme, showing a stock image render of a person stepping on a rake and having it smack them in the face on top, and an image of a man doing a skateboard trick with a rake below, also landing on it.

    The man stepping on a rake is captioned “programming for the first time”.

    The man performing a trick with the rake is captioned “programming for the hundredth time”.

    • tomiant@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I’m not sure how well this works, I upvote the effort, but for someone who’s eye deprived, they’d have to click on the post, and then have their screen reader read through all the comments, before they get to your one describing what’s even going on.

      Honestly I would love to know what the % of people who take part in piefed.social use screen readers. It has to be in the 0.2% percentile, and that’s conservative I think.

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        37 minutes ago

        Yeah, it’s much, much better if OPs provide their own transcription. It’s much easier to see that way. Mastodon and Pixelfed both basically yell at you if you don’t do it, and it’s a shame that Lemmy isn’t the same.

        For small transcriptions, there’s an “alt text” field in the post itself, and for longer ones, they can be placed into the body of the post.

      • bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I think the idea is that this might get upvoted a lot and turns out to be the first comment under this post.

        Also it’s copy-pastable for OP.

        • Zagorath@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          29 minutes ago

          My ideal hope is that by modelling good behaviour, I can encourage more OPs to provide transcriptions themselves in the body or the alt-text field.

          If OPs take my transcriptions and edit it into the body, that’s pretty good too. Especially if more people take up the work so transcriptions get posted on posts that I don’t do myself.

          The algorithm is far too fickle for me to have even considered my comment getting upvoted to the top. Good if it happens I guess, but not in my consideration.

  • pikl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Every time there’s a new site with programmer humor… 2 good jokes, then it’s just a bot spamming the same dead ass memes.

    • tomiant@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I just use AI!

      It solves so many problems.

      And introduced so many more.

      But it solves them too.

      And so on.