I hear these comments for not wanting to help people, and it feels like we’re worshipping individuality to the detriment of community, which is necessary for survival.

  • “I don’t want my money going to ___ .”
  • “This is not a democracy, it’s a constitutional republic!”
  • “You don’t have any freedoms under socialism/communism.”
  • “They’re just looking for a handout because they’re lazy.”
  • “I’m a self-made man. I didn’t need anyone’s help.”
  • “Empathy is not a virtue.”
  • “I don’t see how that’s my problem.”
  • aesthelete@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Religion is not the source of our social bounds and morality rather a parasite of control left over from ancient times.

    Not the person you’re replying to, but I’m an atheist or an agnostic and even I’m not so sure about that.

    When given the idea that there is no retribution or reprocussion for their actions, many people become nihilistic and act terribly.

    I agree that it’s weak to need a “sky daddy” to act properly, but many people are weak.

    • Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      There is good scientific evidence that people do not think about the consequences of their actions before they commit to them.

      Criminals don’t think of the punishment they will receive by society but suddenly a far removed sky daddy will convince them not to rob a store? This is not how any of this works.

      Morality is developed by our social bounds, otherwise every agnostic or atheist would be wildly out of control.

      People are mentally weak because of religion, not despite it. It is the antithesis to critical thinking. The lack of critical thought is why our society is so easy to control.

      I have seen this play out countless times in my life where people realize how fucked up their religion was once they have left it.

      As their eyes open and they realize that they were being controlled by their religious leaders who abused them, they have to wrestle with the life that was stolen from them.

      I am even to the point now where I no longer believe certain people need religion anymore. They need community and a sense of belonging and religious leaders like to highjack that basic need for their own selfish interests.

      • aesthelete@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I am even to the point now where I no longer believe certain people need religion anymore. They need community and a sense of belonging and religious leaders like to highjack that basic need for their own selfish interests.

        I think I agree with basically everything you’ve said here and especially this conclusion. The problem is that for many the only type of these things they can find is couched in religion. As a child-free atheist, I basically have no sense of belonging nor a community.

        In addition, some people’s only exposure to even the very concept of morality or ethics comes through religion.

        • Doomsider@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          You have a community here which is probably more real and fulfilling than going to a church service. Here we are having a discussion you would never get in a typical church. We are both thinking together, discussing, without any authority to tell us otherwise.

          Our sense of right and wrong simply don’t come from religion. It initially comes from our familial bounds but is reinforced through our many interactions with our social groups.

          You can see this in gangsters that believe in God, but also will deal drugs and shoot each other. Their morality is determined by their social group, not their belief in religion.

          As I said. I used to believe like you that religion is needed by some people, but I have begun to doubt this premise.