• SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Don’t tell anyone here that more than 80% of the population of Israel was born there. Definitely don’t tell people that removing people from where they were born because of their ethnicity is the definition of the term “ethnic cleansing”.

    It really hurts people feelings when they realize they support ethnic cleansing when they’re trying to have some fun posting memes about hating Jews. But only Jews that live in a specific area… which they should not be allowed to live! And of course the Jews that support them that live elsewhere. Ah, but if you also that people that aren’t cool with ethnic cleansing anti-colonialism, and say you don’t hate “the good ones” then you’re a cool person within the anti-semitic anti-zionist bubble.

    Remember, a good cult member is always on the attack and never on defense! So post your attacks below:

    • LwL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      Believe it or not i can condemn a country’s actions and think they lost the right to exist in their current form without thinking that the people living there should be displaced, or that everyone living there is in full support of what’s going on.

      Similar to how you might notice that germans still live in germany, but the governmental structure was transformed and there were (poor and insufficient) attempts at denazification. (And yes, plenty of germans were displaced. In similar situations as current israelis would be. But there’s a difference between going to another part of your country and having to go far away/into a neighbouring country. Some suffering is unavoidable once you start a war, and innocents that were powerless to stop it will be swept up in it even on the attacking side)

      Ideally I’d say have palestine govern the area and let the israelis live there, but realistically that can only go wrong since there will be a very understandable grudge that isn’t going away for a long time.

      Regardless, if you genocide your neighbour (or anyone), you lost legitimacy as a country in my eyes.

    • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      You… do realize how the nation of Israel got the land that they’re on, right?

      You do realize what they’re currently doing to Palestinians in the West Bank who have lived on that land for generations… right?

    • chillpanzee@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Calling dibs on someone else’s land is probably a much older idea than any country on the map today.

      • Chloé 🥕@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 hours ago

        oh certainly, but justifying it with “because god said so” is very much american (tho not exclusively, and they probably weren’t the first)

        • AWistfulNihilist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Very much not disagreeing, but that’s literally the Divine Right of Kings. The very basis of imperialism is rooted in religiosity. Look at the Crusades for instance.

          People have been using religion to dehumanize natives and colonize forever.

        • newtraditionalists@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          The holy roman empire, and the crusades happened, so the idea is as european as it is american. Or arguably, more european. Either way, it definitely pre-dates america. And don’t get me wrong, fuck america all the way to hell and back. But humans have been attempting to commit genocide at least as long as written history has existed.

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        The Promised Land was originally God’s idea.

        Strangely, it was the idea of every God that every religion has ever conceived of.

        • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I think it’s more likely that the idea of a god or gods originated with humans who consumed psychoactive plants, fungus, and/or ergot-infected grain. Hardly the bossy types.

          Over time though, the idea caught on and got popular, until most people had heard of or generally believed in it. Then some tightwads came in and decided that people couldn’t get high anymore, so those folks had to take their drugs to secret caves and such.

          Meanwhile, the tightwads appropriated the proto-religious ideas and codified them into stricter religions in order to pacify the masses who over generations had come to believe in such things as gods, and thus religions were converted into instruments of social control.

          • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            I think it’s more likely that the idea of a god or gods originated with humans who consumed psychoactive plants, fungus, and/or ergot-infected grain

            The original nature religions and the like, sure.

            Inherently authoritarian ones like Christianity and the other monotheistic ones, though? Definitely the invention of people who wanted to control other people.

            There’s presumably wasn’t a lot of drugs that make you overly concerned with obedience and imposing your will on others available way back then.

    • newtraditionalists@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      You’re right. The Dutch, and the Spanish, and the English, and the Romans were all totally content with what they had.

      • Cowbee_Admirer@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Not to defend the horrifying Spanish Empire, but it didn’t contain genocide of natives as a tenet. It enslaved people, spread diseases and wars, and murdered millions upon millions, but go to Peru and you’ll see that at least it didn’t reach the goal of extermination to the degree that happened in North America.