Today the first of Feb is Global Switch day, Spread awareness of the Fediverse in your communities.

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      45 minutes ago

      No.

      But mainly because content creators are on YouTube to get audience and a small profit. The technology is fine otherwise.

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 minutes ago

        This is an interesting economics problem. How can a p2p FOSS alternative compete with advertising revenue? The YouTube creators don’t even get most of the money, so it wouldn’t need to be perfect to be better.

  • Rose@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Also, to avoid doing unpaid labour for Jeff Bezos, go from Goodreads to Bookwyrm!

    • Die4Ever@retrolemmy.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      19 minutes ago

      I’ve seen the Reddit users be more receptive of PieFed over Lemmy. In a post suggesting Lemmy, the Reddit users will just comment that it looks ugly, it’s confusing, devs are tankies, etc. Posts suggesting PieFed get less complaints and more signups.

      Also I think the instance choice is easier for PieFed compared to Lemmy. If you tell people to use Lemmy, they’ll probably end up on lemmy.world which is overpopulated, or lemmy.ml

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      41 minutes ago

      Yeah but this is like when Disney makes star wars tv shows. Ignore what the current audience likes and use the show as a vehicle to try and tell them what they should like.

      I didnt think they could do worse than Discovery but the Academy is incredibly bad. On the plus side, Im rewatching Deep Space Nine again.

  • OctopusNemeses@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    There doesn’t need to be a replacement for everything. How much does the world need to revolve around a random person’s hot-take in 140 characters or as many seconds. These are artificial walls.

  • jali67@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    58 minutes ago

    All due respect to Mastodon but BlueSky is way more viable right now.

    • Skavau@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 hours ago

      You don’t have to. Piefed is different software. It does have more features: custom feeds, hashtags, flairs, polls, events, keyword filtering, scheduled posts and more. Much of this is also arriving in lemmy 1.0, but the release so far is undated.

      But some people dislike the UI of Piefed.

    • Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      To users they’re both mostly the same but PieFed has more features and a much better UX, so it’s the one I choose to promote.

        • Rose@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 hours ago

          You can register on a Piefed instance and use Lemmy’s subscription export feature and Piefed’s import feature to retain your subscriptions. Porting comments/posts isn’t a thing.

          There’s work underway creating migration scripts for Lemmy databases to be imported to Piefed, but that is a tool for instance administrators only, of course.

        • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          You create a new account on a Piefed instance. There’s a lot to choose from like Piefed.social, piefed.ca, piefed.blahaj.zone, etc

          Theres a lot of animosity right now between some Piefed and Lemmy users for some reason. I use both, I dunno why people are picking this fight right now, it seems pretty fucking dumb to me.

  • bufalo1973@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 hours ago

    What I miss is a auth service for all of them. Something like a “common user” where you can have all your Fediverse services under the same user.

  • GMac@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 hours ago

    All the proposed services/technologies would benefit the wider consumer base and the user but switching is too big an ask for many people. We need to encourage people into using “as well as” the global defaults. That will build the network effects that lower the cost of fully switching

    An easier and bigger immediate impact would come from people replacing Chrome and google search with respectful alternatives, and/or replacing gmail or outlook with private services like proton or tuta.
    Starve the surveillance machines a little bit.

    • iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Look, I’m looking at reddit posts about niche stuff like a fiend. But when I make a post, I always go here first

      I’ve switched, but I haven’t stopped searching old reddit posts. The cache of information is just too rich to pass up.

      It’s all about mindset. I’m all in fediverse, despite actually using reddit sometimes. Switching doesn’t mean blocking the entire website

    • Sergio@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      We need to encourage people into using “as well as” the global defaults.

      agreed, we need “Monthly Try Something New Day”

  • sol6_vi@lemmy.makearmy.io
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Can we self host loops yet? I’ve been holding out on that one. Not that I use tiktok but I would use loops and could probably get my wife to jump.

  • hzl@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Peertube isn’t really a viable alternative. There isn’t a substantial enough audience for creators and there isn’t really enough content for an audience. I guess if you’re one of the 100 people watching transport evolved that’s cool but it isn’t really a meaningful alternative. I suppose it could be supplementary, but why would creators want to drive their traffic to a site that doesn’t actually matter for their visibility? I imagine the same probably applies to loops.

    Also, like, with video you kind of want a reliable host that you know isn’t going anywhere.

    The rest are okay as long as you’re not super worried about how many people are seeing what you post. Lemmy and Piefed are great for content aggregation and discussion, but they seem to be the only ones that at this point actually do anything that might be helpful.

    I’ve tried Mastodon and while it’s way better than Twitter it isn’t exactly providing a way to reach a substantial audience. Personal websites are probably a better bet for ease of access.

    • karashta@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I feel the same about PeerTube. And the fact it is a defederated network with opt in to federation is a bad model IMO. There’s no way for a creator to get paid, either AFAIK.

      I tried it out. First sign up, I was shuttled to an instance federated with only two other instances. Second sign up, I found what looked like an active instance but there still is just a lack of content. I’m not sure how to fix any of its issues as I see them. I’d love an actual YouTube competitor

    • neo2478@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      My main issue with peertube is that I find it confusing. Its not self contained in the sense on how to subscribe to channels or people. AFAIK you also need a mastodon account for it and to jump through some hoops to subscribe to a creator.

    • BaroqueW@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      For most other formats, everyone creates and shares: photos, posts, sharing links. For more crafted video material, there’s too much of an imbalance between the number of watchers vs creators to make a new platform an easy sell. You’d need a strong creator promise like Nebula.

      • hzl@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Yeah, agreed. The one thing the platforms you see that aren’t YouTube that creators actually use have in common is financial incentive. Nebula is the best example here. Creators get a cut and have more creative freedom, so they actually use it and try to direct their audience to it for bonus content, which seems to actually work. Patreon is similar for a lot of creators, letting them put out additional content with fewer restrictions and letting them get more income from their viewers.

        Some people also seem to have some success with independent platforms. If you look at like a Dropout or Viva Plus, these are both putting stuff out on YouTube and then drawing users in with subscriptions, and that seems to be a sound model.

        But Peertube produces zero dollars for creators, which means they have no incentive to push users there. In fact, they’re incentivized to avoid doing so because there are other platforms that will actually pay them if they can direct traffic there. Peertube lacks both the money-making side of things and the exposure side of things, so there’s no real reason to use it.

        Don’t get me wrong, I’d love to see something independent like Peertube take off, but the model doesn’t really work.

    • bufalo1973@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Because YouTube can shoot down you account and all your videos get blocked if they want?

      Every political content creator should use PeerTube at least as a backup.

      • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        They just use IG and TT as backups. Yeah, you could be banned from all three. But that’s where the audience is, so without that why bother?

        I love the idea of fediverse video, but even I don’t use it. No content I care about. No audience that would care about me. I get more visibility on a Lemmy post that just says “beans” than I would spending an hour making a 30 second video.

        • bufalo1973@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          No service starts as the winner. Each one has to work it’s way up (or down).

          But I don’t say “don’t use YT”. Use it is you want (I do too). But, if you are a content creator, use PF as a backup. There are already some channels that do.

      • hzl@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Most of them have Patreon for that, which actually produces income.

        What’s the incentive? All they would be doing is pushing views away from platforms where having viewers actually benefits them, either through metrics or income or both.

        Honestly the best way to get that going might be to have a company and offer sponsorship deals with the requirement that creators also post to Peertube. But that would require companies having a reason to want people on Peertube.

        • bufalo1973@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Linux Weekly News already has a channel in YT and the same channel¹ in PT, with a sponsor (Tuxedo Computers).

          ¹ the same videos uploaded in both places.

  • altphoto@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Done. I thought it was going to be difficult leaving YouTube but then they blocked new pipe which was my YT crutch. I don’t know what they were thinking I was going to do but it was not re installing their app.

      • altphoto@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        It started to just error out on every video. Some people suggest to revert a couple of versions. But I simply gave up. There’s no anything there that I need.

        • Coelacanth@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          PipePipe is a fork of NewPipe, with more and better features (like built in SponsorBlock). I was watching videos on it just an hour ago.