• Tuscy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      3 hours ago

      He’s just salty because the only games people “purchase” are the weekly free ones.

        • orclev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 minutes ago

          Keep collecting them. Each one you get costs Epic money and helps counter some of that Fortnite cash that lets Epic keep paying for exclusive contracts. Keep bleeding them and eventually they won’t be able to keep buying exclusive releases.

        • Telorand@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          25 minutes ago

          Playnite is the better choice if you’re on Windows, but either way, don’t let Tim’s dumb store stop you from ruining his day by generating a bunch of metrics that show you’re only playing freebies!

      • HailSeitan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        Exactly. The number of people on Lemmy who simp for Valve’s monopoly just because Epic (along with every game developer, big or small) stands to benefit is kind of shocking.

        • Pollo_Jack@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          It isn’t a monopoly because they don’t require you to use their store. Epic has a monopoly of epic exclusive games.

          • HailSeitan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 hour ago

            And ecommerce sellers don’t “have to” sell on Amazon, so they don’t have any market power they can abuse to extract 40-50% fees from sellers, right?

            • Pennomi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              45 minutes ago

              They don’t. My small business sells direct from our site instead of in Amazon, and we do okay.

                • Pennomi@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  39 minutes ago

                  While that’s true, counterexamples are great ways to disprove overreaching implications like “companies must sell on Amazon to be successful”.

                  It is not a requirement. It might be the most profitable way to run an e-commerce business (in which case you’re obviously benefiting from the system Amazon created).

                  • HailSeitan@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    27 minutes ago

                    Nobody thinks that it’s impossible, which is incredibly rare, but rather that it’s very costly not to comply, which is the source of every monopolist’s power. Could Pepsi refuse to sell at Walmart to avoid the huge wholesale discounts they demand over smaller stores? Sure, but it would shoot themselves in the foot, and that’s the source of Walmart’s anticompetitive power, which coerces Pepsi (and lots of other suppliers) and hurts lots of smaller businesses who don’t get the same discount.